My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09421
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:09:12 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:19:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
491
County
Larimer
Community
Unincorporated Larimer County
Basin
South Platte
Title
Resolution - FPR 99-491 - FIS - Larimer County, Colorado Unincorporated Areas, Volumes I - III
Date
3/1/1999
Designation Date
3/29/1999
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, said new report for LariIner County, revised March 23, 1999, includes the <br />following detailed floodplain information for the Dig Thompson River which revises and is, therefore, <br />inconsislent with Resolution No. 181, but which is consistent with previously designated and approved <br />floodplain delineations for the Big Thompson River within the City of Loveland, which delineations <br />were designated and approved by the Colorado Waler Conservation Board as approximate floodplain <br />information by Resolution No. 99-488, but which is inconsistent with the mapped flood elevations and <br />with the water surface profiles associated with those floodplain delineations, which elevations and <br />profiles were not designated and approved by the Colorado Water Conservation Board due to technical <br />errors with stream stationing, as lisled in Table 6 below: <br /> <br />TABLE 6 <br />Detailed Information Which Is Inconsistent With Previouslv Prenared Detailed Delineations but <br />Which is Consistent With Previouslv Prenared Annroximate Delineations for the Citv of <br />Loveland lFPR # 99-488) But Inconsistent With Accomnanvinl!: Flood Elevations and ProfIles <br /> <br />Stream Reach Previous Detailed Previous Approximate <br /> Designation Designation <br />The Big Thompson River from a point approximately 1340 feet FPR #181 FPR # 99-488 <br />downstream of the crossing of West 1st Street upstream to the <br />downstreamface of the crossing of West 1st Street In the City ofJ.oveland <br />The Big Thompson River from the upstream face of the crossing I1f West FPR#181 FPR # 99-488 <br />1st Street upstream to to the downstreamf""e of the crossing of Taft <br />A venue in the City of Loveland . <br />The Big Thompson River from the upstreamface of the crossing I1fTaft FPR #181 FPR # 99-488 <br />Avenue upstream to a point approximately 710 feet downstream of the <br />crossing of Wilson Avenue In the City of Loveland <br /> <br />; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said new report for Larimer County, revised March 23, 1999, includes by <br />reference the following detailed floodplain infomlation for the Big Thompson River, which is also <br />included in Table 4 above, which was originally prepared as part of Resolution No. 19 and <br />subsequently incorporated by FIA as part of Resolution No. 128, which was superceded by and, <br />therefore, inconsistent with Resolution No. 181, as listed in .Table 7 below: <br /> <br />TABLE 7 <br />Detailed Information Which Is Inconsistent With <br />Previouslv Prenared Detailed Information <br /> <br />Stream Reach Previous DeSignation <br />The Big Thompson River from the crossing of County Road 9E upstream to FPR# \81 <br />a point approximately 1340 feet downstream of the crossing of West 1st <br />Street <br />The Big Thompson River from a point approximately 710 feet downstream FPR# 181 <br />of the crossing of Wilson Avenue In the City of Loveland upstream to a point <br />approximately 1 mile upstream of the crossing of County Boad I9E <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.