Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SEma.TWO <br /> <br />Alternatives Considered <br /> <br />. Construction of approximately 13,500 linear feet of grass-lined flood control channel with a <br />bottom width varying between 110 feet and 220 feet. The channel would be located north of <br />and parallel to CR 22.5, would start east ofCR 35, and extend east to the South Platte River. <br />Construction ofthe channel's discharge structure would involve approximately 450 linear <br />feet of the South Platte River's stream bank. The channel would have 3:1 side slopes. A <br />cross-section of the channel is shown in Exhibit 4. Riprap would be placed at the flood <br />control channel's confluence with the South Platte River. The current estimate of excess <br />excavated material is 450,000 cubic yards. Some ofthis material would be used to raise a <br />portion of State Highway 6 as a part of the Highway 6 bridge construction. The City of <br />Sterling has plans for approximately 75 percent to 100 percent ofthe material to be used on <br />City property near the project. The CDOT has made a request to use a portion of the material <br />on local state projects. All disposed material would be placed and protected according to the <br />latest version of the "CDOT Erosion Control and Stormwater Quality Guide," which outlines <br />the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program requirements and <br />provides design guidelines for erosion and sediment systems. <br /> <br />. Construction of an approximately 140- foot-long by 80- foot-wide highway (4-lane) bridge at <br />State Highway 6. The bridge would carry both northbound and both southbound Highway 6 <br />lanes plus the median over the channel. <br /> <br />. Construction of an approximately 144-foot-long railroad bridge at the UPRR tracks over the <br />channel. <br /> <br />. Construction of a twin 60-inch-diameter, concrete pipe siphon structure to carry the Sterling <br />No. I Ditch under the proposed channel and relocated county road. The siphon structure <br />would be constructed of a concrete pipe running under the channel and would utilize gravity <br />to move the water through the pipe. The siphon would be designed to carry 200 cfs. <br /> <br />. Relocation of one well owned by the Groundwater Appropriators ofthe South Platte River <br />Basin, Inc. (GASP) (Exhibit 5). <br /> <br />. Closure ofCR 39, north of the proposed channel that would be constructed, and <br />abandonment of portions of County Road 39 within and immediately north of the constructed <br />channel. <br /> <br />. Extension ofCR 22 to allow access to two homesteads after the closure ofCR 39. Presently, <br />it is planned that Logan County would extend CR 22 because it is a county road. <br /> <br />. Modification of irrigation works (head ditch and water turnouts) associated with two existing <br />irrigation wells located just south of the proposed channel. <br /> <br />. Construction of a 13,500-foot access road along the north side of the proposed flood control <br />channel. The elevation of the access road would be less than the adjacent county road at all <br />locations. <br /> <br />. Construction ofa drop structure at the outfall of the proposed flood control channel at the <br />South Platte River. <br /> <br />Photographs ofthe location of the proposed flood channel are provided in Exhibits 6 and 7. <br /> <br />2-3 <br />