Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The last subsection contains one question with a series of possiblc additional information on past and <br />prcsently used mitigation measures, Each measure was to be rated on cffectiveness with a poor, fair or <br />good response. A description or cost ,estimate was also provided by communities, <br /> <br />Multi-Obiective Use of Stream Corridors. The first question in this scction asked the communitics if multi- <br />objective projects have been used and ifso, have they bcen effective, A description is allowed ifrhe multi- <br />objective project was not effective, A wpporting inquiry was made to see if there was an interest in multi- <br />objective projects. A list of benefits was provided with space to give a dcscription of the project, location <br />and cost estimate for each item, The Ian two questions aslwd if there was a concern for prcserving the loss <br />of agricultural lands and would there be interest in any other type of flood related project. Both have a <br />space for descriptions and the first mal' include a map, <br /> <br />Institutional Issues, This secl:ion starts off by determining what regulations the community has, Next was <br />an inquiry concerning the neled for wat(:rshed based drainage master plans and if so, for what watersheds, <br />The third question is to determine if ccmmunities would think it beneficial to develop a statewide storm <br />drainage criteria manual. The next two explore community funding mechanisms; do they have one and <br />what would they prefer if a ,:hoice was given. Finally, what signific,Ult institutional barriers are there to <br />improving the community's manageme1t of stream corridors, <br /> <br />Organization Questionnair.! <br />Or~anization Information, Essential information is contained in this section such as the organization's <br />name, address, zip, phone, fax, e-mail, and respondent's name and title, <br /> <br />Or~anization Profile, The mission statement or main purpose of the organization is asked along with the <br />prinlary activities, Both questions have descriptive response boxes, <br /> <br />Floodplain Management. The first part of this section discusses: (1) significant floodplain problems <br />relating to stream corridors, (2) what is valued about stream corridors, and (3) what barriers stand in the <br />way of achieving goals for stream corridors, The next subsection is flood related issues whic:h discusses <br />stream erosion and flood problems relat(:d to irrigation or water delivery facilities, A description may also <br />be included for each question. The last subsection is floodplain mapping needs with information on <br />floodplain mapping and what reaches may be unmapped or need to be revised, <br /> <br />Multi-Obiective Use of Stream Corridon, The use of multi-objective projects effectively is asked with a <br />follow-up question on the nel~d to use these types of projects, If there is an interest in multi-objective <br />projects, a list of benefits is provided with space to givt; a ct.!scription of the project for each, Then <br /> <br />II1-4 <br /> <br />97.060 001 <br />