My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08639
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:15:09 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:46:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Statewide River Rehabilitation and Floodplain Management Needs Inventory
Date
2/18/1998
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />asked to list watersheds needing master planning, The lLrl$Wt'rs were so varied that flexibility in entering <br />these lists was given to the data recorder. This wllS a big factor in the design of the database. <br /> <br />DescriDtive Responses, Descriptive responses were rest,rved for explanations and descriptions associated <br />with yes/no responses or with questions asking for an opinion (used more in the organization <br />questionnaire), There is not a limit to how many characters can be typed for a response like there is with <br />text responses. Many times, the response mirrors tbe answer in the questionnaire witb minor interpretation <br />by the data recorder. <br /> <br />Community Questionnaire <br />Community Information, The community's name, county, address, zip, phone, fax, and e-mail can be <br />found in this section along with the rl:spondent's namt" title, addn:ss, phone, fax, and e-mail. Other <br />information includes populaltion, river basin, hydrologic unit number, and state congressional senate <br />districts. <br /> <br />Community Profile, Four questions were asked in this st:ction all of which are listed responsl:s, The first <br />question regards significant floodplain problem relating to stream corridors, The next concerns what is <br />valued about stream corridors, The third discusses barriers in achieving community goals for stream <br />corridors and the last asks which person or group is most active with community stream corridors, The <br />type of person or group is also indicated, <br /> <br />FloodDlain ManaQement, Th.: floodplain management section was separated into four subsection The first <br />subsection explores floodplain information such as tbe population in the j()()-year and 500-year floodplains, <br />structures in the floodplaiilll and the estimated assessed value of structures in the floodplains, The <br />subsection also contains a list of critica:, facilities in lOO-yr floodplain, <br /> <br />The flood related issues subsection asks about major flood events; the year and magnitude of that flooding <br />and the possible explanation, In addition erosion damag,: information is provided with linear feet of <br />channel and acres lost to stream channel migration. The final question concerned flood prob!i:ms relating <br />to existing irrigation or other water delivery facilities, Some communities provided supplemental maps <br />to delineate erosion damage. <br /> <br />The third subsection deals with floodplain mapping needs, For example, are there any Slreams with <br />unmapped 1000yr floodplains and are the, maps current for those areas already mapped? The first question <br />may include a map or a list of reaches and their associated miles that need to be mapped, while the second <br />may have an explanation of why the maps are not current or why the responder is not sure, <br /> <br />II1-3 <br /> <br />97-06000] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.