My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08639
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:15:09 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:46:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Statewide River Rehabilitation and Floodplain Management Needs Inventory
Date
2/18/1998
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />more efficient to use, room was allotted to record these comments. <br /> <br />TYPE OF INFORMATION OBTAINED <br /> <br />The number and quality of the responses were generally very good, There were some that were very <br />detailed and had great ideas, and others, due to inexp(~rience or lack of familiarity with floodplain <br />management did not fully answer particular questions. On the other hand, some communities felt there <br />was no reason for them to be filling out the questionnain~, Either there were no streams running through <br />the community or their town was on top of a hill. Bear in mind, when reviewing the data in Chapter 5, <br />the total number of respondents will not always ado up to the total number of questionnaires received due <br />to the number of communiti,~s who renlrned a questionnaire but did not completely fill it out. <br /> <br />DATABASE CONTENTS <br /> <br />Questions were phrased diffl:rently throughout the questionnaires. In an attempt to get the most use out <br />of the questions, different types of responses were stored in the database. For the Needs Assessment <br />database, there are four basic types of responses; text, yes/no, listed, and descriptive. Below are <br />descriptions of each type of n~sponse followed by a lJrief table of contents for the community questionnaire <br />and the organization questiotmaire, <br /> <br />Types of Responses <br />Text Responses, Text responses are very short and contain exact infonnation, Most text responses allow <br />only 30 characters to be typ(~d, Examples of text responses can be found in most of the community or <br />organization infonnation responses, Items such as tile address, telephone number, and respondent's name <br />are not questions that need to be deciphered or divided into smaller ideas, <br /> <br />Yes/No Responses, Yes/no responses were the checkl~d items in the questionnaire, Some of these <br />questions were also associated with a descriptive response for further explanations or a text response for <br />including a cost, length, or location. All yes/no responses used a list box. Basically, only the accepted <br />answers are allowed to be entered for that question. A good example of this, which is not quite a yes/no <br />response, is the effectiveness of existing or planned mitigation measures. The questionnaires asked for a <br />'poor,' 'fair' or 'good' rating. In the database, however, thl: rating is not stored as a text but as a number. <br />If a query of this type is planned, the assigned number will have to b,~ looked up in a table showing that <br />relationship. The number is needed to properly sort the data, <br /> <br />Listed Resoonses. Listed responses are for those questions that asked for either a list or were left open- <br />ended so that a community could answer with any number of responses, For instance, communities were <br /> <br />IIl-2 <br /> <br />97..{)6() 001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.