My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08639
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:15:09 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:46:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Statewide River Rehabilitation and Floodplain Management Needs Inventory
Date
2/18/1998
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />organizations were asked ifthere were any threatened stn:am corridors with a description of which streams, <br />Next, the organization's participation in a multi-objective stream or river project was inquired and with <br />what resources the organization would be willing to commit. The ne:xttwo questions deal with interest in <br />other types of flood related projects and the concern for preserving the loss of agricultural lands, Both <br />questions have a description associated with them, The fmal question is a lengthy one divulging information <br />on past and presently used mitigation measures, Each measure has been rated as poor, fair or good with <br />a possible description. <br /> <br />Institutional Issues, The nel:d for wate rshed based drainage master plans is asked along with the need to <br />develop a statewide storm drainage criteria manual, Organizations were also asked if they believed there <br />was adequate funding mechanism and which funding mechanisms they would support, Needs in the realm <br />of water resources were questioned and what progr<lIllS or funding sources would address thosl: needs, The <br />next question regards the programs and supports the organization receives, Organizations were also asked <br />if there was adequate support for reproducing, communicating and disseminating watl:r resources <br />information and if not, what priorities were higher. Finally, the question is asked about interactions with <br />the CWCB and what suggeslions to CWCB they would give, <br /> <br />In sUJllInary, the compilation of the corrununity responses and organization responses produced a database <br />with significant information embedded in each table, As a result of the database's design, the tables except <br />for the Community Information or Organization Information tables contain only responses from a <br />questionnaire (e.g, if a community did not return a questionnaire, there is no information in these tables <br />for that community), This helps simplify querying which is discussed in the next chapter. <br /> <br />III-S <br /> <br />97-060 DOl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.