My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08154
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD08154
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:13:48 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:25:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Community
Westminster
Stream Name
Big Dry Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Master Drainageway Planning Study
Date
3/1/1973
Prepared For
Westminster
Prepared By
UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />B-3 <br /> <br />Department of Houslnq and Urban Developmer~: Water and User Faci 1 1- <br />ties Proqram: This program Is designed to assist and encourage the pro- <br />vision of adequate storm sewer assistance for collection, transmission, <br />and discharge of storm water caused by rai nfall or "round water runoff. <br />Grants of up to 50 per cent of eligible development cost may be pJ'Ovided <br />for projects that are consistent with a program for a unified or officially <br />coordinated area-wide system as part of the comprehensive planned develop- <br />ment of the urban area, In Boulder many of the creeks originate within <br />the urban area and can be des I gnated as parts of an urban draI nage system <br />and therefore the cost of constructIng nE!eded draina'ge Improvements could <br />conceivably be shared with the Department of HousIng and Urban Development:. <br /> <br />Corps of Enqineers, Section 212 Floc~d Control Proiects: Section 212 <br />of the Flood Control Act permi ts the Corps of Engl neers to expend up to <br />$1,200,000 for local flood control projects wi thout specific Congressional <br />authorization, These projects must be shown to be economi cai ly justified, <br />using Standard Corps Benefit Cost Analyses, Since the Cor'ps in many larger <br />flood control projects has taken full responsibIlity for bridges, it is <br />conceivable that the Corps could become an active partner in thIs draInage <br />project, <br /> <br />Soil Conservation Watershed Projects.: Si It and sediment which washes <br />from the watersheds causes problems in downstream drainage facilities, <br />Therefore, in conjunction with the drainage improvements called for in this <br />study, appropriate watershed treatment should be provided in upstream areas, <br />Conservation and land treatment measures could Je financed by the Soi 1 Con- <br />servation Service, Needed rights-of-way Y/Quld have to be provided locally, <br />These expenditures are not included in the drainagE! estimates, but necessary <br />steps should be taken to expedite proper land treatment in the upstream draIn- <br />age areas, <br /> <br />DepartmE,nt of Health"Education and ~~lfan~ Solid Vaste !emonstratlon <br />Grant: The operation of sediment deto3ntion basins on Bear' Canyon Creek <br />provides an opportunity to demonstrate ho., drainage faci 1 i ties and solId <br />waste disposell facilities could be Integrated into a progr'am which would <br />provide new benefits, A Demonstratioll Grant conceivably y/Ould deveiop pro- <br />cedures and methods for removing si It and debris from nood detention basins <br />and incorporclte them as fill and cover materiai in a solid waste disposal <br />operation to construct desIrable topographic features, Flood water deten- <br />tion and retention on alluvial fans is difficult to achieve because of the <br />rapid siltation which depletes the facII ity of I ts storage capacity, By <br />joining such features with solid waste disposal lew opportunities may be <br />developed, If such a Demonstration G,'ant is developed. the federal govern- <br />ment would provide $2 for every $1 of local money to demonstrate the work- <br />abilIty and benefIts of such an approach, <br /> <br />State of Colorado Sources <br /> <br />States are becoming more aware of an urban responsibility, and state pro- <br />grams throughout the country are being formulated to permit a closer relation- <br />ship of the state and its cities, In Colorado, however, little progress has <br />been made by the State along these lines, There appear to be only two State <br />programs from which funds could be realistIcally made avai lable for the <br />project, Each is dIscussed below, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.