Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B-2 <br /> <br />from urbanized land Is very large compared wi th natural land, Peak flood <br />flows are soon regenerated, though wi th a different lag time, <br /> <br />The charging of those who create urban runoff reportedly has legal prece- <br />dent in the I-ecent decision of the Colorado Supreme Court in Haskins vs, <br />Borland, an agricultural drainage problem dispute near Loveland, <br /> <br />Those land owners who built on-site ponding, Il10ludIng roof top ponding, <br />would pay less than those who had larger and Immediate runoff, The ser- <br />vice charge would encourage on-site ponding which would result in a sig- <br />nificant community wide benefit, <br /> <br />POTENTIAL SOllRCES OF FUNDS <br /> <br />When urban drainage is approached in a compl-ehensive manner a financing <br />strategy can be formuiated which draws funds from a variety of potential <br />sources, These potential sources can be catego-ized according to the <br />level of government involved -- federal, state, county. and city, A <br />financing strategy will relate specific costs for drainage faci lIties to <br />the most approprIate source of funds so as to facilitate financing and to <br />encourage the more rapid implementation of a comprehensive program, <br /> <br />For example, in Boulder County there are approxlnately twenty-four real- <br />istIc funding sources which could be used for the construction of compre- <br />hensive drainage facIlities, These sources are identified and discussed <br />briefly in this Section of the Report, This pl'E!5entation Is followed by <br />a discussion on how the funds could be used, Here, several choices are <br />possible, e.S" direct use (pay-as-you-go basis), basis for financing <br />bonds, and use as matching grants, <br /> <br />Fede ra 1 Sou rces <br /> <br />It appears that at least six sources of funds could be drawn upon to <br />assist In the financing of this project. Each 01' these sources is dis- <br />cussed and a judgment Is made as to where it would best fit In the program, <br /> <br />Land and Water Conservation Act Funds: This fund accrues primari ly <br />from user fees collected by the National ,,'ark ServiCE', Yearly allocations <br />of the money a re made ava 11 ab 1 e to states on a SO-50 match i ng bas is, The <br />State in turn is to use these funds for the purchase of open space, This <br />open space can be related to urban areas so that it can better serve the <br />people of the State, <br /> <br />Housinq and Urban Development OPE""...~,E,~~~lnts: Title VII of the <br />HousIng Act provides for Open Space Grants to focII itate the purchase of <br />open 1 ands in urban areas, These g rants a re avo i lab 1 e on a 50'-50 match i ng <br />basis with local governmental units, Such funds could be used to purchase <br />rIghts-of-way in the drainage project since these ri,lhts-of-way are multi- <br />purpose features which will provide greenbelts through the urban area and <br />provide for recreational activIties as well. <br />