Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. Negative factors: Controllable.- <br /> <br />a. "Dam Failed" not in warning message. - The warning delivered within <br />the walk-in sites at Aspenglen Campground did not uniformly state that <br />a dam had failed [28]. The following description of responses to flood <br />versus dam failure warnings issued in the Big Thompson Canyon during <br />the 1976 flood illustrates the importance of the dam failure message: <br /> <br />"* * * a sheriff I s deputy came into the restaurant to <br />warn people of rising water and possible flooding. He <br />instructed them to cross the river and climb up the <br />mountainside. The people took no action in response to <br />this warning. Twenty minutes later he returned with the <br />message that the dam at Estes Park had broken and the <br />people in the restaurant should cross the river and <br />climb immediately. People did respond to this second <br />warning. . . So~~ perceived no danger from a flash <br />flood warning yet responded quickly to the message that <br />the dam at Estes Park had broken"[17]. <br /> <br />The threat of a flood from a dam failure seems to mobilize people to <br />action because they can appreciate the suddeness of the threat. Unlike <br />floods from rainstorms, for which people seem to expect considerable <br />advance environmental clues (e.g., hard, steady rainfall), people <br />appreciate that a flood from a dam failure can occur when everything <br />else seems normal [17]. ' <br /> <br />b:' Location of public facilities. - Aspenglen Campground was located a <br />short distance downstream from Cascade Dam. Portions of the campground <br />were within the 100-year flood plain. Access into and out of walk-in <br />sites was by bridge; thus, there ,was only one path to safety rather than <br />many. Access to the entire campg~ound was by a single road which <br />, became impassable due to floodwaters thereby preventing rangers from <br />reaching the campground to issue additional warnings. <br /> <br />c. Flood plain development. - Many of the motels and other structures <br />flooded were located only a few feet above the river. Estes Park and <br />Larimer County had adopted ordinances tied to the 100-year flood <br />standard for new construction. Currently accepted hydrologic tech- <br />niques, which do not consider structural failure, projected a 100-year <br />flood elevation for the town and county which placed minimal restric- <br />tions on new flood plain development. <br /> <br />d. Public information. - There were no signs in Aspenglen Campground <br />warning people of flood hazards and what to do in a flood situation. <br /> <br />e. Lack of understanding among flood plain occupants of the gravity of' <br />the situation. - The true magnitude of the flooding that would occur in <br />Aspenglen Campground was not conveyed in the warning message given to <br />the walk-in campers. The following statement illustrates this: "I did <br />not find out for many minutes that a dam had broken, I attribute <br /> <br />9 <br />