Laserfiche WebLink
<br />which enter streams ann rese~voirs, ao- <br />proximately 50 percent comes from agri- <br />cultural areas and sa percent comes <br />from urban and const~uction areas, with <br />the major portion coming from construc- <br />tion areas. Th~ kinetic en~rgy of fal- <br />ling raindrops is the agent primarily <br />responsibl~ for erosion. Kinetic ener- <br />gy of raindrops for a given storm is <br />more than 200 times that of th~ runoff. <br />Rainfall provides the energy necessary <br />for detachment while th~ runoff pro- <br />vides the carrier necessary to carry <br />th~ detached particles away. The am- <br />ount of gross erosion occurring depends <br />on the eroding power of the r~infall <br />and the erodibility of the soil. The <br />Universal Lozs Equation gives erosion <br />as a function of rainfall en~rgy and <br />quantity, soil erodibility, slope and <br />length, cover, and manage~ent practice. <br /> <br />BARKDOLL, M.P. et al. 1977: -Some effects <br />of dustfa11 on urban storm water ouali- <br />tyw. J. W~ter pollution Control - Fea- <br />eration. Vol.49(9): pl976-1984. <br /> <br />Key words: water pollution: urban ru- <br />noff: air pollution eff~cts; water <br />pollution sources; storm runoff; <br />heavy metals; nutrients; ch~mica1 ox- <br />ygen demand; miscellaneous chemicals: <br />erosion. <br /> <br />Runoff from 47 storms in a small urban <br />watershed was analysed for 16 water <br />contaminants. Dustfall was also col- <br />lected and ana1ysed. There were two <br />distinct but overlapping groups o( con- <br />taminants found in the storm water <br />quality analysis. Minerals and solids <br />have r~latively constant concentrations <br />(rom storm to storm, wh~reas, heavy me- <br />tals, nutrients and COD had decreasing <br />concentrations with increasing storm <br />water discharge. Further COD, Hg, Cl, <br />Pb, 5i02, P04 are primarily due to <br />dustfall. The relative influence of <br />dustfall for other constituents will <br />have to be verified by further study. <br />Pervious area in urban watersheds <br />should not he disregarded in determin- <br />ing pollutant yields. ~odels using <br />only street surface contaminants will <br />yield conservative results. Removal <br />was found to be a function of storm ru- <br />noff volume and only mildly affected by <br />runoff rates. Certain pollutants such <br />as 5.5., Ca, Mg, 504, and CaC03 are <br />available in extremely large quanti- <br />ties. These constituents probably <br />arise from the erosion of disturbed <br />land areas. <br /> <br />BARNA.RD, J.R. and CROrEY, T.E. <br />1974: -Physical and economic aspects <br />associated with runoff from urban <br />growth: a methodological approach-. <br />In, Proceedings National Symposium on <br />urban rainfall and runoff and sediment <br />control, University of Kentucky, lex- <br />ington, Ky.: p2l9-228. <br /> <br />Key words: <br />mathematical <br />streamflow~ <br />techniques; <br />charge. <br /> <br />Ilodel studies: <br />models; urban runo{f~ <br />storm runoff: analytical <br />flood routing: flood di5- <br /> <br />Urban growth often impinges upon local <br />watersheds resulting in alteration of <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />the frequency and magnitude of flooding <br />along small creeks ann low areas. <br />Urban development gener~lly takes place <br />within the context of government~l in- <br />tervention through land use zoning and <br />planning with the explicit purpose <br />being to protect property rights. In <br />spite of land use regulation. urban <br />growth frequently produces negative ex- <br />ternalities in the form of increased <br />frequency and magnitude of flood ha- <br />zard. This paper presented the metho- <br />dology for examining the physical and <br />economic aspects of urban growth in a <br />lOcal watershed. Specifically, the <br />Stanford Watershed Hydrologic Model was <br />further d~velop~d for statistically <br />determining the impact of urbanisation <br />upon flooding frequency and magnitude. <br />The results from the hydrologic model <br />were linked to an economic model to de- <br />te~mine the extent that n~gative exter- <br />nalities impinge upon property ~s a re- <br />sult of urbanisation and change in fre- <br />quency and magnitude of flooding. An <br />analysis of the property market is cen- <br />tral to the issue of determining the <br />effect of the changes in flooding ha- <br />zard on property values and the extent <br />of negative externalities upon property <br />owners and possible income distribution <br />effects. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BARNES. R.C. <br />tices <br />tion <br />p233. <br /> <br />1969: -Erosion <br />adapted for urban <br />abatement-. A5AE <br /> <br />prac- <br />pollu- <br />No. 69: <br /> <br />control <br />use and <br />Paper <br /> <br />Key words: <br />abatement: <br /> <br />erosion control~ pollution <br />erosion; flood control. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Changes in land use brought about by <br />rapidly expanding urban centres are <br />causing serious erosion and sediment <br />pollution problems. This is focusing <br />attention on the n~ed for overall plan- <br />ning for best land use for all segments <br />of our society; for adequate zoning to <br />implement orderly development; for <br />trained staff to administer, guid~, ~nd <br />supervise developm~nts, and for quide- <br />lines, standards and soecifications for <br />use by those who r~quire them. Th~ <br />basic principles for erosion control, <br />orderly removal of excess runoff, con- <br />trol of flooding, and reduction of sed- <br />iment damage are known and have been <br />used for other land uses for years, and <br />can be modified for urban use. Any <br />practice which uses these principles <br />will also reduce pollution below the <br />C1evelopment. <br /> <br />< <br /> <br />BARRE, N.LA. et al. 1973: <br />nation of snow-. <br />Vol.7(B), p1215-121B. <br /> <br />- lead <br />Water <br /> <br />contami- <br />Research, <br /> <br />Key words: <br />snowmelt. <br /> <br />oil <br /> <br />wastes; <br /> <br />lead: <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Snow from disposal sites and along <br />roads contained considerable Pb due to <br />the combustion of leaded gasolines by <br />automobiles. In soite of Pb concentra- <br />tions up to 4,330 'ppm in the sample <br />sediment, the highest concentration in <br />the filtrates W3S 0.21 opm with an <br />average of 0.e4 ppm. Dumping snow away <br />from watercourses instead of directly <br />into them significantly reduces Pb con- <br />tamination in the waters from this <br /> <br />. <br />