Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />An investigation of the pollution con- <br />centrations and loads from storm water <br />runoff in an urban ar~a was conducted <br />in Tulsa, O~lahoma. The scope of the <br />project included: a field ass~ssment <br />of the storm water pollution by Obtain- <br />ing samples of the water resulting ftom <br />precipitation and surface runoff from <br />selected test areas within the metro- <br />politan area; development of an ana- <br />lytical procedure for correlation of <br />storm water pollution with selectively <br />defined variables of land uses, envi- <br />ronmental conditions, drainage charac- <br />teristics, and precipitation; and de- <br />velopment of a plan for implementing <br />remedial measures necessary to abate or <br />control sources of pollution in an <br />urban arca. Storm water runoff samples <br />were collected from IS 'discrete' test <br />areas in th~ Tulsa metropolitan area <br />for laboratory analysis in terms of <br />quality standards for BOD, COD, TOe, <br />organic Kjeldahl nitrogen, soluble or- <br />thophosphate, chloride, pH, solids, <br />total coliform, faecal coliform, and <br />faecal streptococcus pollutants. <br />Selected land use parameters, environ- <br />mental conditions, drain~g~ and precip- <br />itation data, along with storm water <br />pollution factors, provided input data <br />lor functional relationships to enable <br />assessment of 9ollution from storm <br />water runoff. Reco~mendations were <br />m~de for a plan of ~ction for prevent- <br />ing and controlling storm water pol~u- <br />tion from urban areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BACON, M.R. 1976: .Storm water pollution <br />and flooding effects of urban use-. <br />Unpublished report to the Auckland Re- <br />gional Authority, paper No.2, 2lpp. <br /> <br />K~y words: urban runoff: <br />urbanisation; channel l'!rosion: low <br />flow; salinity; flood discharge: <br />9round vater resources: water pollu- <br />tion sources: watershed management; <br />sewage disposal. <br /> <br />The conversion of land from rural to <br />urban use results in a decrease in sur- <br />face permeability and a marked increase <br />in freshwater runoff to receiving wa- <br />ters. This incre~sed runoff has the <br />following effects; Cl) Strcllm chanm~ls <br />become erod~d, widened and unst~b]e ano <br />stream ecology changes. (2) Flooding' <br />occurs aore frequently as the land is <br />unable to store peak rainfall and re- <br />lease it gradually after the peak of <br />the storm. (3) Ground water b~comes <br />depleted as w~ter runs off impermeable <br />surfaces instead of sOuking into th~ <br />ground. (4) Possible reduction of bGlse <br />flow of the stream in periods of low <br />rainfall due to decreased jnfiltr~tion <br />to. ground water stor~g<;t. (Sl r'arin-= <br />waters into which fresh wat~r~ dis- <br />charge change in character ~nd ~cology <br />as a result of a decrease in s~linity <br />and inflow of urban storm w3t~r 0011u- <br />tants. The intention of this p~p~r is <br />to present some evidence of thes~ urban <br />use effects and to sUg'g~st w~ys in <br />which these problems might be rc~uc~~ <br />both through b~tter urban manag~m~nt <br />and the siting of urban us~ away fro~ <br />the most vulnc[~ble loc~tions. The ac- <br />tual proc~ss of urban development is <br />not discussed her~ and neither is the <br />question of sewage disposal. <br /> <br />BAILEY, B.H. et al. 1975: .Variation of <br />urban runoff quality ~nd au~ntity with <br />duration and intensity of storms". <br />Phase III, Vol.3, analysis of flow ~o- <br />dels, final report. T~xas Univ~rsity, <br />lubbock, Water Resources Centre: 32pp. <br />(See also Phase III, Vals. 1,2,41. <br /> <br />~!y words: peak discharge: dat~ col- <br />lection; mathematical models; surface <br />runoff: urban runoff. <br /> <br />Runoff from a 1499 acre urban watershed <br />In Lubbock, Texas, was monitored over a <br />9 month period from Sept~mber 1974 to <br />May 1975. The observed peak flows and <br />runoff volumes were compared to the <br />outp~ts generated from 4 runoff models <br />which used the precipitation records <br />and watershed characteristics as input. <br /> <br />BARFIELD, B.J. and HAA.N, C.T. <br />1972: -grosion sedim~nt production". <br />In, Proceedings of symposium on urb~n <br />rainfall management problems, Universi- <br />ty of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky. <br />Technical Report UKY 51-72-CE16: <br />p73-95. <br /> <br />ley words: urban hydrology: <br />sediment yield: urb~n <br />urbanisation. <br /> <br />erosion; <br />runoff; <br /> <br />Sediment is the larqest single polluter <br />ot our waterways today in terms of <br />total solids. Of the total solids <br />