Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. Public information and education campaigns promoted by the government or interest groups tend <br />to result in consistent support of mitigation because the message to the public is directed and <br />controlled by these recognized agencies. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />2. Timing of public information and education programs is important. Have public service <br />announcements written in advance. Programs are most effective immediately after the occurrence <br />of a hazardous event, but in addition, frequent messages about the benefits of disaster planning are <br />influential. <br /> <br />3. Information and educational programs need to assess current levels of information held by the <br />public in order to design the proper technique for communicating mitigation messages. <br /> <br />4. Inconsistency in media reporting on mitigation have led mitigators to develop carefully considered <br />media contacts and working relationships with them. This helps prevent misleading or sensational <br />media coverage. <br /> <br />s. The issue of credibility stems from the need to keep the confidence of the public with well- <br />executed public information and education efforts. <br /> <br />6. Credibility is enhanced by using communication methods which provide direct contact with the <br />public. Simple messages are more understandable and are received as more credible. <br /> <br />7. Public information may, in itself, become a primary instrument for disaster mitigation. <br /> <br />C. Rules <br /> <br />Cohesion of mitigation opportunities is assured through rules and regulations. In dealing with government <br />agencies, rules are a part of the process that must be accepted and understood. Government laws and <br />measures including codes, ordinances and statutes, as well as non-government agreements and covenants, <br />are components of the rules dimension. Also, legislation, as well as litigation, enforce or support <br />mitigation. <br /> <br />1. Rules contain the philosophy, goals and criteria of disaster mitigation. All of these must be <br />understandable to the public in order to promote citizen participation. <br /> <br />2. Mitigation rules minimize interpretation and contain all administrative procedures for regulation. <br />This includes roles, exceptions and applications. <br /> <br />3. As experience is gained with mitigation rules and as research presents new knowledge, mitigation <br />directions can be updated. This process is expedited if rules are designed in two parts. The first <br />part is the rule itself. The second part details acceptable standards of performance. Rule changes <br />require governing body approval: standard changes can be done administratively. <br /> <br />4. Among the most important rules are building codes, land use plans, zoning ordinances, and for this <br />discussion--a city or county tree ordinance. A tree ordinance is critical. Therefore, if a community <br />does not have a tree ordinance, one should be adopted. <br /> <br />120 <br />