My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05412
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Geomorphically Effective Floods
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />50 GEOMORPHlCALL Y EFFECTIVE FLOODS <br /> <br /> <br />Fig. 5 _ Photograph of breach and slump failure of the Porter Hill dam. near Roseburg, Oregon. <br /> <br />change. We hypothesize that other fl60ds in the same <br />basins with smaller peak stream power values, but longer <br />duration, could precipitate significant and perhaps <br />permanent changes in channels and floodplains_ <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />3.1 Changing srream power owr a flood hydro graph <br /> <br />If flow duration is believed to be an important factor in <br />the llbility of floods to alter landforms, then it is important <br />to know the temporal and spatial distribution of stream <br />power, throughout a flood. For flooded locations not at <br />gaging stations, indirect discharge methods are commonly <br />used to calculate peak discharge associated with high-water <br />marks. With data derived from these investigations, only <br />instantaneous peak stream power for the flood can be <br />ascertained and reported [Costa, 1987]. Peak stream power <br />is useful in evaluating flood competence [Costa, 1983; <br />Williams, 1983], but is not the sole factor in evaluating <br />whether a flood may be geomorphically effective. Time- <br />integrated flood power, computed over a hydro graph and <br />combined with some quantitative measures of landscape <br />resistance, such as shear strength of river channel banks <br />and floodplains, may be more useful to evaluate potential <br />for geomorphic effectiveness. <br /> <br />There are no widely applicable procedures to quantify <br />landscape modification accomplished by a given flood. <br />Yaluable qualitative descriptions have been used in some <br />studies [Kochel, 1988; Miller, 1990; Miller and Parkinson, <br />1993], but data requirements for a more rigorous <br />quantitative analysis of landform modification preclude our <br />use of anything but a simple two-class scheme at this time. <br />The amount of geomorphic alteration is assigned a <br />qualitative value of small or extreme. Small disruption <br />represents sites where floodplains are inundated, but with <br />little or no erosion of the floodplain surface_ Channel scour <br />and erosion are local, drainage patterns remain similar <br />(e.g. a meandering stream still meanders), deposition and <br />\ <br />sedimentation are restricted to small, local areas, and the <br />valley floor and channel have minimal changes. Extreme <br />disruptions occur in areas where the entire floodplain and <br />channel are substantially affected by erosion or deposition. <br />New channels may be formed or the floodplain may be <br />entirely eroded. Extensive areas of deposition may occur <br />on uneroded floodplain or in newly eroded areas during the <br />flood recession. Bedrock, if present, may have been <br />eroded, and the stream channel and stream pattern may be <br />completely realigned. We recognize that deposition of <br />sediment from large floods can significantly alter alluvial <br /> <br />--- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.