My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05412
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Geomorphically Effective Floods
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COSTA AND O'CONNOR 51 <br /> <br />i <br />j: <br />r <br />I <br /> <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />Fig_ 6. Photograph of the channel and floodplain about 100 m downstream from the Porter Hill dam_ Note the <br />complete lack of any identifying evidence that a large floM had ever passed this location. The tape marks the <br />maximum flood stage. <br /> <br />TABLE 1. Dam and flood characteristics of Reservoir No.3, <br />and Porter Hill Dam. <br /> <br />Feature <br /> <br />Reservoir No.3 <br />Centralia, Wash_ <br /> <br />Porter Hill near <br />Roseburg, Oreg_ <br /> <br />Type. of dam <br />Date built <br />Date failed <br />Height (m) <br />Volume (m') <br />Flood depth (m) <br />Slope <br />Discharge (m'/s) <br />Peak w (w/m') <br /> <br />Concrete-lined <br />1914 <br />1991 <br />5_2 <br />13,250 <br />1.0 <br />0_09 <br />71 <br />3,300 <br /> <br />Earthen <br />early 1990s <br />1993 <br />5_8 <br />15.000 <br />1.0 <br />0_10 <br />30 <br />2,900 <br /> <br />forms, but our analysis focuses on the erosional thresholds <br />of extreme floods. <br />For comparison to the Centralia and Porter Hill dam- <br />failure floods, we analyzed floods from three thoroughly <br />studied historic large-dam failures. one cloudburst-rainfall <br />flood along a sand-bed stream in Colorado, and the flood <br /> <br />of record along the Mississippi River (Table 2). We also <br />include two well-known paleofloods. or series of paleo- <br />floods, the Missoula and Bonneville floods, which resulted <br />from large natural-dam failures about 10,000 - 15,000 <br />years ago along the Columbia and Snake Rivers. <br />These floods were selected because (a) we have done <br />field work at all sites except the Mississippi River, and are <br />familiar with the flood effects; (b) the floods were <br />unequivocally large and capable of generating substantial <br />hydrodynamic forces; and (c) we had the appropriate data <br />for our analysis for each flood_ All available hydraulic <br />data, except that from the Mississippi River, are from <br />indirect-discharge measurements. Gaging stations, where <br />present, were destroyed during the floods. Indirect- <br />discharge data increase the likely error, but our attempt is <br />to present a concept and approach that can be further <br />verified with better data. - <br />Field investigations and descriptive reports indicate <br />which floods were effective geomorphic floods, and which <br />were not. Little or no change occurred to channels or <br />floodplains associated with the floods from the two small <br />upland dams at Centralia and Porter Hill discussed <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />~ <br />!I <br />,j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.