My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05412
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Geomorphically Effective Floods
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />COSTA AND O'CONNOR 49 <br /> <br />,II <br />III <br />!' <br /> <br />:11 <br />1"'1 ! <br />: ' <br />, <br />i I <br />;Id: <br />,III, <br />'Ii' <br />,1;1 <br />!!!f' <br /> <br />, , <br />! I <br /> <br />: i, <br />I',ji <br />" ' <br />j I <br />rl <br /> <br />I <br />"1' <br />" <br />I, <br />" <br />i!ii <br />"'1 <br />,111 <br />1::;1 <br />1", <br />," <br /> <br />"\I <br />'r <br /> <br />Fig. 3_ Photograph of the floodplain below Reservoir No.3, Centralia. Wash" where there was only minimal <br />damage from the flood. <br /> <br />80 <br />g ~ 70 <br />~o 60 <br />onJ <br />zen 50 <br />-.a: <br />~~ 40 <br />a: (I) 30 <br /><a: <br />G w 20 <br />en Iii <br />O:::E 10 <br />o <br />o 1 <br /> <br /> <br />/"" Reservoir No.3 <br /> <br />Porter Hill Dam <br />......:::--.--.----... <br />----.---.-.--..-- <br /> <br />2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 <br />TIME. IN MINUTES, FROM DAM FAilURE <br /> <br />Fig. 4_ Reconstructed triangular hydro graphs for the Centralia <br />and Porter Hill floods. <br /> <br />passed at about 3 mfs (Figure 6). <br />During large floods along high-energy fluvial systems, <br />floodplains can become unraveled, severely eroded, and <br />inundated by coarse gravel and debris [Nanson, 1986; <br />Jarrett and Costa, 1986]. A floodplain that is not ravaged <br />by an extreme flood is the exception, and requires <br />explanation. Some studies that documented the lack of <br />erosion and modifications to channels and floodplains <br /> <br />,I' <br /> <br />accompanying large floods attributed the lack of land <br />surface disruption to insufficient stream power [Nanson and <br />Hean, 1985] or extraordinary stabilization of surfaces by <br />vegetation [Zimmerman and others, 1967]. These explana- <br />tions refer to thresholds of landscape resistance that must <br />be overcome by the flow for it to be effective. The <br />Centralia and Porter Hill floods generated peak stream <br />power values that were likely capable of surpassing <br />resistance thresholds offered by the alluvial valleys and <br />floodplains. <br />We infer that the lack of disruption of the valley floor <br />despite extraordinarily large peak stream power acting <br />against the floodplain was chiefly a consequence of the <br />very short duration of high stream power during the flood_ <br />In both dam-failure floods, high flows were not sustained, <br />and the entire hydro graphs passed the study areas within <br />about 16 minutes (Figure 4). The maximum flood power, <br />while large- enough to greatly surpass landscape resistance <br />thresholds, lasted for only a small fraction of that time and <br />was not effective in breaking down floodplain vegetation <br />and eroding channels and floodplains. Thus high-energy <br />floods, of very short duration, may cause little geomorphic <br /> <br />H <br />: I ' ~ <br />iil <br />OI' <br />II' <br />1:1 <br />rti <br />lr <br />"'~ : <br /> <br />" <br />Iii; <br />j <br />I! <br />'II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I- <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.