My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05412
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Geomorphically Effective Floods
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />48 GEOMORPHICALL Y EFFECTIVE FLOODS <br /> <br /> <br />Fig. 2_ Airphoto of the failure of Reservoir No_ 3. Centralia, Wash. (from Costa, 1994). <br />I <br /> <br />/ <br />3. STREAM POWER, GEOMORPHIC WORK, AND <br />CHANNEL CHANGES <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />Stream power per unit boundary area (w) expressed in <br />watts per square meter 0N/m'), is computed from <br /> <br />w '" 'YQS/w <br /> <br />where 'Y is specific weight of the fluid (9800 N/m' for <br />clear water), Q is discharge, S is energy slope, and w is <br />water-surface width. Peak stream pO'fer per unit bound- <br />ary area at the sites of indirect-discharge estimales for <br />the Centralia flood, 3,300 W/m', and for the Porter Hill <br />flood, 2,900 W/m', are among the largest values ever <br />documented for historic flows [Baker and Costa, 1987]. <br />The historic floods in other basins that generated similar <br />or smaller values of peak stream power per unit bound- <br />ary area all were considered geomorphically effective <br />according to our inspections, and the authors' reports. <br />In contrast, in spite of the magnitudes of the peak <br />stream power of the two dam-failure floods in Oregon and <br />Washington, the erosional effects on downstream alluvial <br />channels were unimpressive. Characteristics of the original <br /> <br />channel at Centralia are not known. The floodplain is about <br />20 m wide and bounded by a bedrock ridge on one side, <br />and roadfill on the other. The slope is about 0.09, and the <br />surface is grass-covered and regular, with three or four <br />widely-spaced large trees. Floodplain sediment consists of <br />gravel and cobbles in a silt and clay-rich matrix. During <br />the flood, the original channel in the small valley was <br />enlarged, and a l.5-m headOllt formed. The 20-m-wide <br />floodplain was entirely inundated by about one meter of <br />water flowing at aDout 4.2 mis, but neither the floodplain <br />nor floodplain vegetation were destroyed or greatly <br />modified (Figure 3). Most of the visible change in the <br />floodplain is attributable to deposition of coarse sediment <br />from the preceding debris flow, not the water flood. <br />At Porter Hill, the floodplain slopes at about 0.10 and <br />consists of open forest and moss-covered stumps. The <br />surface is covered with leaf litter. ferns, and a few fallen <br />trees. Floodplain sediment consists of poorly-drained and <br />unstratified gravel, silt, and clay. Following the flood at <br />Porter Hill, moss was still intact on the upstream side of <br />trees below high-water marks, and ferns and leaf litter <br />were virtually undisturbed. It was nearly impossible to tell <br />that a large flood, 10 m wide, and 1 m deep, had recently <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.