Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FLOOD CONTROL MEASURES CURRENTLY <br />BEING PERFORMED BY LOCAL INTERESTS <br /> <br />After the high flows and resulting flood fight in June, 1985, public <br />awareness and concern about potential severe flooding the Alamosa area <br />increased substantially. As a result of this, the City and County have <br />undertaken a plan to begin to provide some increased flood protection in the <br />area. With funds that have been received from the State of Colorado, the City <br />and County are currently rebuilding a portion of the levee system, from the <br />State Highway 160 bridge down stream to the Denver Rio Grande Railway bridge <br />(see Plate 3). While the City and County have the funds to do this small <br />portion of construction, the flood threat to the area still remains high. The <br />cost of this work is approximately $733,000. The new section of levee, if <br />incorporated with any future Corps of Engineers construction, will provide <br />100-year protection to both banks and have a subsurface drainage system to <br />help prevent seepage under the levees. The Corps of Engineers is currently <br />analyzing plans which will incorporate the work performed by the local <br />interests. <br /> <br />As a result of the passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, it <br />is now possible for a local sponsor to receive credit for work they thave <br />performed if it is compatible with a Federal project currently under study. <br />Albuquerque District, through the Assistant Secretary of the Army, is <br />currently in the process of certifing the work being done by the City and <br />County for the purpose of cost sharing arragnements for the flood prevention <br />measures which the Corps of Engineers could recommend as a result of this <br />study. Once the work being performed by the locals is completed, the costs of <br />that work can be incorporated into the overall benefit/cost ratio for the <br />entire project and the amount of credit that the local sponsor can obtain be <br />more accurately assessed. For this report it was assumed the $733,000 was the <br />final cost. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED <br /> <br />A range of alternative measures for flood control are being considered. The <br />major flood problem, as was discussed in the previous section, is caused by <br />flows originating on the Rio Grande. In general there are two ways to reduce <br />flood damages. First, the damagable property is protected from the flood at <br />the location of the property or, floodflows are prevented from reaching the <br />property. <br /> <br />Either of the above mentioned means of flood protection can be accomplished <br />using nonstructural or structural alternatives. Nonstructural alternatives <br />are flood control measures which do not employ traditional features, such as <br />dams, levees or channels. Non-structural alternatives can involve <br />construction, although it is usually limited to the property being protected, <br />or can be accomplished through an institutional change. <br /> <br />The alternatives considered in this study are listed below. A discussion, <br />of each alternative is presented in the paragraphs which follow. <br /> <br />17 <br />