FLOOD05009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.;1 are asked if there any essential issues that have not been mentioned. Planning team breaks up into small teams to interview local decisionmakers 'and interest groups to identify needs and concerns relative to the plan. Break-out rooms are made available for each team. We plan on six teams (at this time): 1) Recreation & open space, 2) structural tlood controVtluvial geQmQr- pholQgy, 3) econQmic sustainability, 4) water quality & erosion control, 5) wildlife & fisheries, and 6) cultural. There will be a NEUTRAL facilitator and recorder fQr each team'. There will be a one and o'ne-half hour (facilitated) session in the morning (following the plenary session) and two in the afternoon, which selected persons of various interests and geographic locations in the basin will attend. These sessiQns will be conducted in a manner similar tQ smaUwork groups. In addition' to issues and'concerns related to the topic(s) of each team, information should be cQllected on potential sQlutions, agencies, individuals or groups. resPQnsible fQr actions and suggested time frames for implementation. W.oRKSH.oP DAY TW.o Planning teams conduct field resource assessment. . NQTES: Each team will be provided with a van and a local guide with interest in the subject mat- ter of that group. FaCilitators, recorders, and illus- , trators will go along on a space-available basis. Nine mini-vans have been reserved and we are trying to find more. W.oRKSH.oP DAY THREE.. Teams draft gQal statements and alternative measures to resolve issues and needs in the pla;;ning area b~sed . on the issues and concerns presented tQ their group~, informatiQn gained during their field reconnaissance, and the expertise .represented in each team.. Roving illustrators are made available tQ sketch example plan elements for public review. . NQTES: Facilitators and recorders need to help teams draft goal statements and alternative mea- sures bas~d on information gathered from the sessions on day one and refined through field reconnaissance and available data. Teams also need to identify parties responsible for implemen- tation, implement~uion time frames, and example plan measures for illustration. Teams should be encouraged to 'ihink of suggested plan measures in a basin-wide, integrated, comprehensive, and holistic manner. EVE N I N G .0 FWD R K S H.o P DAY T H,R E E Team leaders .or recorders present propQsals for public review in front of studio and South Dakota Public Radio' Network audience compQsed of general public, local decisiQnmakers, and interest groups. Viewers call in with questions for planning teams. W.oRKSH.oP DAY F.oUR Teams revise plan elements based on public review. Team leaders, form core group to develop cQmposite plan with other team members in background and 10- minute breaks every hour for input and caucusing. . NQTES: "Shuttle diplomacy" will be employed in addition to caucusing. Selected facilitators and/or sub-group members will have the oppor- tunity to carry notes to the team leaders for input. Other facilitators and recorders should remain available. W.oRKSH.oP DAY FtVE Present final plan to local' decisionmakers and reg- ulatory officials for approval. Grant-making/funding agencies available to answer questions on applying for furids. CQllect comments on process from local grQUPS and individuals. . N.o T E s: FaCilitators and recorders will help direct applicants to persons knowledgeable ab~ut' grants in the applicants' area of interestand try to record any unmet needs (grant assistance not available for a specific are~ of interest [and '. the interested party or partieS] and speCific plan measures for which no applicants come forward). .