My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05009
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:57 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:11:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Multi-Objective Planning Process for Mitigating Natural Disasters
Date
1/1/1994
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING,nAM MEETS IN A",,~EPARATE ROOM; THE RECORDER <br /> <br />. List of the agencies, private groups, or individuals <br />that should be responsible for implementing each <br />suggested solution. <br />. Possible sources of technical and financial <br />assistance for each suggested measure. <br />. A schedule for implementation of each <br />suggested solution. <br /> <br />These items are recorded on the flipchart and entered on <br />the computer. Writing the ideas down helps clarify the <br />group's thinking and make sure everyone is in agreement. <br />A written record that the rest of the group can see keeps the <br />discussion focused. <br />Facilitators can help the teams plan their allocation of <br />time during the day. One possibility is for the teams to use <br />about 1'/, hours to develop the goals, issues, and needs; take <br />about 21/2 hours to develop alternative solutions to resolve <br />the issues and reach the goals; and then break for lunch. <br />After lunch they could spend about 2 hours developing <br />criteria to evaluate the suggested solutions and selecting <br />the best ones, and another 2 hours identifying sources of <br />technical and financial assistance, specifying responsible <br />parties, and setting time frames for implementation. <br />Each team should be given examples of both the paper <br />and computer formats in which they are expected to pro- <br />duce their reports. Illustrators can be available to sketch <br />selected elements of the plan for public review. <br /> <br />,~.*~~ <br /> <br />Teams are encouraged to think of suggested solutions <br />in an integrated, comprehensive, and holistic manner, and <br />to consider the vvhole planning area. <br /> <br />STEP 29 <br />Obtain more public input through a public meeting <br />and/or broadcast. Representatives from each team present <br />tentative proposals for review in front of a public audience. <br />Questions for the planning teams are fielded. lllustrations <br />completed so far are brought to the meeting. <br /> <br />FOURTH DAY OF TilE WORKSHOP <br /> <br />STEP 30 <br />Remind teams to revise and update their suggested <br />solutions. For about an hour, facilitators can help the <br />teams revise their ideas based on public review from <br />the night before and any interaction they have had with <br />other teams. <br />If some issues are covered by more than one team, <br />it may be '....'orth\'-lhile to form an ad hoc "common issues" <br />team that ,..,ill work solely on the common issues, rather <br />than have several teams duplicating efforts. If needed, <br />a special team could also work on intergovernmen- <br />tal coordination and/or on how different grant and <br />assistance programs can be integrated to solve com- <br />plex problems. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-~ <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />:" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.