My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04820
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:04:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluation and Implementation of Urban Drainage and Flood Control Projects Completion Report
Date
6/1/1974
Prepared By
CSU Environmental Resources Center,
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />however, and the requirements for evaluation will differ accordingly. <br />A useful framework for evaluation and implementation strategy formu- <br />lation is the Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS), which seeks <br />to tie planning with implementation more closely, a problem throughout <br />the public sector. Use of PPB Systems in urban governments has recently <br />become of heightened interest because of the need to improve the teturn <br />from public expenditures. A recent example of the use of PPBS was in <br />the City of New York under the Lindsay administration. In this context, <br />the intent was to use PPBS to ensure that ",. . decisions involving the <br />allocation of resources were to be made only after the review of explicit <br /> <br />statements of agency objectives, or at least crude analysis of alter- <br /> <br /> <br />native programs for meeting those objectives, and of detailed estimates <br /> <br /> <br />of the relative costs and benefits of those programs [21]. <br /> <br /> <br />Using PPBS as a framework, the following types of UDFC evaluation <br /> <br /> <br />problems are readily apparent: <br /> <br /> <br />1. Planning Stage <br /> <br /> <br />How to determine the merit of individual projects in <br /> <br /> <br />order to determine if and the conditions under which they <br /> <br /> <br />should be implemented. In some cases, projects which <br /> <br /> <br />passed evaluation in this stage would be shown on a <br /> <br /> <br />ma6t~ plan. This is sometimes called the pnog~ <br /> <br /> <br />evalu.a.tio It -6tudy [11]. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Programming Stage <br /> <br /> <br />How to rank competing UDFC projects to determine priori- <br /> <br /> <br />ties, optimum investment timing and desirable sequences <br /> <br /> <br />of implementation. These are sometimes called ~nt~- <br /> <br /> <br />pltog~ c.ompttJW.olt -6tucU.e6 [11]. <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.