My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04820
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:04:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluation and Implementation of Urban Drainage and Flood Control Projects Completion Report
Date
6/1/1974
Prepared By
CSU Environmental Resources Center,
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,-- <br /> <br />budgeting stage if it does not: <br /> <br /> <br />1. Satisfy needs of a group of citizens and <br /> <br /> <br />2. Accomplish this in a sufficient manner to warrent <br /> <br /> <br />funding from a limited financial resource base. That <br /> <br /> <br />is to say, the project must win the right to be funded <br /> <br /> <br />in a complex evaluation process. <br /> <br /> <br />In order to gather information needed for this complex evaluation <br /> <br /> <br />process three hierarchies of information are needed: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />1. The operational goals and objectives of the UDFC system. <br />(To be distinguished from general, broad .urban goals). <br />e.g., "To provide adequate drainage for minor runoff <br />events (say 2-year frequency) at minimum annual cost." <br />Of course, the selection of such an operational goal <br />should qe subject to a tradeoff analysis after the cost <br />of achieving the goal is known. <br />2. The measures of effectiveness needed to determine the <br />extent to which ,alternative projects meet the above goals. <br />(Costs and Benefits). <br />3. The coefficients and ranking scales needed to arrange <br />the measures of effectiveness into a decision-making order. <br />In the analysis of UDFC projects, several distinct evaluation sub- <br />problems appear. A good systems analysis or planning process will begin <br />with establishment of objectives and measures of effectiveness, move <br />into formulation of alternative solutions, evaluation and tradeoff <br />analysis, and finish with a selection or decision stage. The use of <br />this procedure depends on the stage of planning or implementation, <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.