My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04776
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:13 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:59:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Pitkin
Community
Aspen
Stream Name
Roaring Fork River, Hunter Creek
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Aspen Village GMP Submission
Date
5/30/1980
Prepared For
Pitkin County
Prepared By
Aspen Village
Floodplain - Doc Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />irrigated pastures around which the development is scattered. <br />Even though homesites may be lotted into 2 to 5 acre parcels, <br />only the immediate area around the homesites will be con- <br />sidered yard area. The non-yard area of any parcel will <br />continue to be treated as irrigated pasture. The town- <br />house cluster and single-family development is estimated to <br />displace only 18 to 20 acres. When this acreage reduction <br />is calculated on all the irrigated land under AF-l zoning, <br />an overall 8% to 9% reduction in irrigated land occurs. A <br />plan to deed covenant the irrigated pastures will be sub- <br />mitted at Detailed Submission. <br /> <br />E. Natural and Man-Made Hazards <br /> <br />Based on the 1979 referral letter of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (Appendix), additional investigation was <br />requested for the riverfront homesites to insure they were <br />outside the 100-year floodplain. As shown on the "River- <br />front Homesites Plan," the laO-year floodplain boundary from <br />the Wright-McLaughlin Engineers' report, "Floodplain Infor- <br />mation Report, Roaring Fork River," has been plotted. This <br />report and its laO-year floodplain boundary has been adopted <br />by the Water Conservation Board and the County as their <br />floodplain standard, and has been used as the guide to <br />locate the homesites. Moreover, the intent of the applicant <br />is to avoid any floodplain problems and the applicant will <br />retain Wright-McLaughlin Engineers to prepare a Detailed <br />Submission site specific guidelines/recommendations report <br />for the riverfront homesites. If the report recommends any <br />of the homesites should be eliminated, this will be done <br />prior to Detailed Submission. A letter providing the Water J <br />Conservation Board with more detailed information on the <br />1980 plan is included in the Appendix. <br /> <br />Based on other 1979 referral agencies' recommendation, the <br />applicant will at Detailed Submission: <br /> <br />1. Prepare a wildfire fuelbreak plan for the homesites for <br />State Forest Service and Planning Office review. <br /> <br />2. Prior to issuance of building permits, site specific <br />soils reports will be required by the applicant for the <br />homesites to establish building foundation and grading <br />criteria. <br /> <br />No other natural or man-made hazards were raised by the 1979 <br />referral comments. <br /> <br />F. Visual Vulnerability <br /> <br />The primary visual concern for the development is visibility <br />from Highway 82. Earlier text has described how the design <br />of the project has minimized the visual impact from Highway 82. <br />Moreover, by relocating the 9 mobile homes presently on the <br /> <br />- 15 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.