Laserfiche WebLink
<br />107. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Ca.1MERCE:, <br /> <br />i , ~ <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />at Las Animas and the Area C9nservatlonist at Lamar who stated that <br />the proposed Las An I mas Laca I Protect i on Project wou I d fit' in' ~l'll , <br />with the progr:ams of the, So i I Conservat I on Serv ,i ce and tH, 'So i i' con~ <br />servation Districts in the area and would benefit agriculture by , <br />preventing ,flooding of farmlands. The State Conservationih alsosug- <br />gested a few mi nor changes in the r<>port c!raft and offered further <br />ass i stance upon request. The rev I 5 Ions have ,been made as suggested. <br /> <br />c. Enqineerinq and Watershed Planninq Unit.- T~e,He~d, <br />Engineering and Watershed Planning Unit, statl'd that hls,~omments on <br />the draft of report had been coord I nated with those of the, Cci'lorado <br />State Conservationist. <br /> <br />a. Burl'au of Publ ic Roads.~ The Rl'gional Engineei-,'Reg'i,on <br />Nin~, cOllllllElntl'd 'that the Colorado Dl'partrrent of Highways propo?l's to , <br />replacl' thl' U.S. Highway 50 bridgl' which crossl'S the Arkal)sas Rivl'rat <br />Las Animas, as a part of its regular construction program., Hl'alsci <br />statl'd that thl' nl'W bridgl' wi I I providl' adl'quatl' watl'rway to pass thl' <br />projl'ct design discharge of 140,000 c.f.s. Thl' Division Enginl'l'r for <br />thl' State of Colorado expressed general interest in the drat~ of report <br />butd i d 'not make specific comments. " <br /> <br />b. Coast and Geodetic Survev.- ,Th,e District Office!:, Kansas <br />City District, made no comment on the rl'Portdraft. <br /> <br />108. PUBLIC HEALTH SERV !CE,U.S. bE PARTME NT OF HEALTH"EDLCAT (ON <br />AND WELFARE.- During preparation of this report, t,he Regional Firogram <br />Director, Water Supply and Pollution Control, Dallas Regional Office, <br />was requested to subm I t his V I ews as t9 whether th,e city se,wagelagoons <br />would constitute a publ ic health hazard or otherwise detract from the <br />aesthetic qual ities of the, fishing lakerequestec!by thl' city of Las <br />Animas. He replied that the public health aspects of, fol:"ming the lake <br />near the sewage lagoons had been reviewed with representatlVl'$ 'of their <br />Denver Regional Office and with the Colorado Departrrent of ,Pub I ic Health. <br />He stated furthl'r that thl' publ ic Hl'alth Sl'rvlcl' concurs with, the' reCQm- <br />rrendations of ,the Director of thl' Eng Inl'ering 'and Sanitat'ion DivisiQn," <br />Color~do Department of Public Health, regarding thl' provi'sion of cl'rtain <br />safeguards, 'br ief 1'1 as follows; <br /> <br />a. En large the sl'wage lagoons to conform with Statl' standar,dsj <br />b. Contro I wel'd growth in and around the lag'oons, to ,d i scouragl' <br />mosquito brl'edingj <br /> <br />c. Enc losl' the sl'wage lagoons with a 6-foot high. cha i n link', <br />fence to prl'vl'nt accl'SS by ch. i I dren attractl'd to watl'r,j and <br /> <br />d. Post signs along the fencl'advislng thl' public of the <br />fac i'l I ty and warn I ng aga i nst trespass i ng. <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />R 1/28/64 <br />