My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04360
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04360
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:01 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:34:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Bent
Community
Las Animas
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Interim Report on Review Survey for Flood Control
Date
8/1/1963
Prepared For
Las Animas
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;;. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />95. The acquisition of borrow material for the levee from the <br />area Qesigoated for the fishing lake would result in some additional <br />costs because of overhaul and excavation from the wet. Local interests <br />have agreed to assume these costs, currently estimated at $33,000. <br /> <br />96. The total annual charges for the Las Animas Local Protection <br />Project are estimated at $59,000, as given in table 7. The Federal <br />annual charges would be $48,770 and the non-Federal, $10,230. The <br />annua I charges I nc I ude interest and amort i zat i on of the Federa I and <br />non-Federal investment at an interest rate of 3 percent over a 100- <br />year per lod . <br /> <br />97. Monetary bene.f its wou I d accrue to the Las An i mas Loca I Pro- <br />tection Project by the prevention of flood damages within the 6,880- <br />acre area which would be protected from flooding. Intangible benefits <br />which cannot be measured in monetary terms also would be attributable <br />to the project. Secondary benefits would accrue but they have not <br />been included in the monetary benefits described herein. <br /> <br />98. The annual benefit creditable by the prevention of flood <br />damage I s the difference between the average annua I damages with and <br />without the project in place, assuming the authorized Pueblo Dam in <br />operation. The average annual damages without the project in opera- <br />tion amount to $82,300, including an allowance of $25,800 or 45.64 <br />percent for future development. The average annual damages with the <br />project In operation under the existing state of development are <br />$8,100. By adding an allowance for future development (45.64 percent), <br />the total average annual damages with the project in operation amount <br />to $11,800. The benefits attributable to the project for the pre- <br />vention of flood damages are therefore $70,500. <br /> <br />99. Major flooding has been infrequent in the Las Animas urban <br />area; nevertheless, the fear of floodi~g under present conditions has <br />an adverse .influence on land values. This is particularly true of the <br />medium- and low-cost residential areas in the lower part of the city <br />where the flood hazard is greater. It is estimated that removal of <br />the flood treat would increase land values 10 percent in the low-cost <br />residential area and 5 percent in the medium-cost' residential area. <br />In addition, 20 acres of land in the business district would increase <br />in value about 2 percent. The remainder of the business property and <br />the high-value residential property are subject to less frequent <br />flooding; therefore, removal of the flood hazard would have only a <br />negl igible effect on the land values in these areas. The total in- <br />crease in land values attributable to the project is estimated at <br />$63,800, which would be real ized by numerous landowners. This amount <br />reduced to an annual return at an interest rate of 6 percent is $3,900. <br /> <br />100. The intangible benefits of flood control improvement at Las <br />Animas include prevention of loss of human I ife, reduction of health <br />hazards, and enhancement of pubi ic security. Flood control would <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />R 1/28/64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.