Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Jefferson County as well as certain Hydro-Triad, Ltd. analytical procedures <br /> <br />and computer programs. <br />Subsequent to the initial data gathering and field reconnaissance work <br />to establish basin boundaries and existing storm drainage features, the <br />study area was divided into 104 separate sub-basins within the 13 major <br />drainageway areas totaling 36.3 main channel miles and 1.0 miles of special <br />shallow flooding evaluation. The physical parameters, i.e., area, length, <br />slope, percent imperviousness of each sub-basin for the future development <br />conditions, were then defined and the design storm hydrographs developed <br />for the 10 and 100 year recurrence interval storms. The design storms werp <br />defined based upon data presented in the Rainfall/Runoff Information report, <br />which were compared to the isopluvial ~aps presented in the Urban Storm <br />Drainage Criteria Manual. The design rainfall values were checked against <br />recently compiled U.S.G.S. data. <br />The combining of the hydrographs and channel routing (Muskingum method) <br />through the basins was accomplished by a computer program which produced <br />the resultant hydrograrhs at the various design points. Routing of the <br />flood hydrographs through the various ponds or reservoirs on the north branc!] <br />of McIntyre Gulch and at the detention areas created by the various road <br />embankments was performed by a reservoir routing program using the Modified <br />Puls method (Reference 6). These data were then used to define future basin <br />development flood plains for the 10 and 100 year floods along the major drain- <br />ageways by performing a backwater analysis throughout the channel reaches. <br />The channel sections used in the backwater analysis were digitized from <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br />GENERAL STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION <br /> <br />aerial photographs. <br /> <br />A. Study Area <br />The area for the Green Mountain Major Drainageway Planning Study <br />comprises portions of four major drainage basins; McIntyre Gulch, Lakewood <br />Gulch, Lena Gulch, and Bear Creek. The various channels in these basins <br />drain the major portion of Green Mountain. The General Location Map, (Figure I) <br />shows the study area and the major basins. The basin location and boundaries <br />are shown in Figure 3. The 11 drainageways have been assigned letter des- <br />ignations from A to L in a counterclockwise direction around Green Mountain. <br />Drainage from the east side of Green Mountain is tributary to McIntyre <br />Gulch. The McIntyre Gulch portion of the study area contains 2.45 square <br />miles (see Table I). The basin is comprised of Drainageways A, B, C, and D <br />totaling 9.13 stream miles of flood hazard delineation. Drainageways A and B <br />make up the South Branch of McIntyre Gulch and Drainageways C and D make up <br />the Center Branch and North Branch, respectively. The flood hazards for the <br />reaches of McIntyre Gulch below the limits of the Green Mountain study area <br />were previously delineated in Flood Hazard Area Delineation, McIntyre Gulch <br />(Reference 9). The McIntyre Gulch basin and hydrological feature descriptions <br />were set forth in Project Reuse (Reference 4). Since the study area contains <br />only portions of the basins defined by Project Reuse, a direct comparison <br />cann~t be made. However, no significant c~Jnges to the boundaries or the <br />description have resulted from the Green Mountain study. The storm drainage <br />problems in the McIntyre Gulch basin as discussed in Drainage and Geological <br />Hazards, Planning Area 12, (Reference 18) were reviewed as part of the basic <br />input data for this study. <br /> <br />2 <br />