My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03631
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03631
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:54:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Stream Name
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Title
South Platte River Channel Improvement Project - Administrative Correspondence
Date
2/26/1998
Prepared For
Arapahoe County
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />CONFIDENTIAL <br /> <br />his alterations cause harm, the owner of the dominant estate <br />must replace, repair, and maintain drains or channels on the <br />servient estate to prevent damage to those lands. If the <br />dominant owner increases the runoff in a manner or quantity to <br />do more harm had been done historically, that discharge can be <br />enjoined as a continuing trespass. <br /> <br />Each of the requesting entities7 is dealing with runoff in <br />excess of historic amounts due to the development of their <br />properties. If the Board determines that permitting the <br />increased runoff to pass through its property would be <br />compatible with the purposes of the Project, then the Board <br />could rely upon the case law described above as a basis to <br />enter into an easement for the passage of the stormwater <br />runoff through its property. It is recommended that a written <br />easement be utilized so that the responsibilities of both <br />parties can be specified. <br /> <br />The Board has two options with this type of request. It <br />can evaluate all such requests or it can develop rules and <br />regulations establishing standards for its staff to utilize to <br />evaluate such requests and present the information to the <br />Director for his decision. <br /> <br />QUESTION 7: Can the Board grant a request for an easement for <br />the construction of a deck and volleyball court for a <br />privately owned restaurant? <br /> <br />RESPONSE 7: The Board's only express statutory authority is <br />the provisions of ~37-60-119(2} 15 C.R.S. (1990) which require <br />the Board to present the request to the legislature for its <br />approval. <br /> <br />The Board could determine that it had the implied authority to <br />grant an easement, a revocable license or a revocable permit <br />as is discussed above. <br /> <br />7 Double L Subdivision (a/k/a Wiggins and Ackerman proper- <br />ties), Waste Management, Inc. and Federal Express are the entities <br />mentioned in the Staff's memo to the Board, as amended. We <br />recommend that the Board's staff check with the Colorado Department <br />of Health and any appropriate local agencies to determine that all <br />such entities: I} have all necessary permits, 2) are in compliance <br />with all necessary permits, 3) are not involved in and have not <br />been involved in any proceedings for violations of any such permits <br />or for failure to have any such permits, or for failure to comply <br />with any other applicable statutes, ordinances, and/or rules and <br />regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.