Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Goals of stormwater management agencies are fairly consistent across the <br />Country. The principal goal is to safeguard human health and life. Other major <br />goals are to: maintain and improve the aesthetics and quality of water bodies, pro- <br />tect flora and fauna, and protect the value of real property. The mere setting of <br />priorities and goals does not in itself assure that existing stormwater-related <br />problems will be corrected, or even improved significantly. Impediments to effec~ <br />tive management of stormwater and institutional problems that impede or block <br />attainment of goals are prevalent in most parts of the United States. These prob- <br />lems and their solutions are highlighted in this chapter and covered in detail in <br />the balance of this report. <br /> <br />Impediments to Stormwater Management <br /> <br />Problems created by flooding, soil erosion, sedimentation and water pollution <br />together with unsatisfactory or non-existent surface drainage facilities would seem <br />to be self-evident. Nevertheless, there appears to be an insufficient awareness <br />and appreciation of the high economic costs, restrictions, inconveniences and con- <br />sequences attributable to failure to provide adequate programs and facilities for <br />managing stormwater. The limiting conditions that thwart solutions arise from all. <br />segments of our population--officials and staff members of public agencies, pri- <br />vate industry, land development firms and the general public. In many metropolitan <br />areas, lack of effective central coordinating agencies enjoying public confidence <br />and legal authority is undoubtedly a prime contributor to today's problems in <br />mitigating the physical impacts of stormwater. <br /> <br />Current practices in urban hydrology, stormwater drainage and floodplain manage- <br />ment themselves have characteristics which limit solutions of problems and con- <br />tribute toward future problems. Floodplain zoning meets with considerable opposi- <br />tion from land owners and, in some cases, from officials in local government who <br />are concerned about the reduction of the tax base. The possibility of "confisca- <br />tion without compensation" is a serious matter and requires careful consideration. <br />The lack of comprehensive planning and of authority to truly manage the floodpl.ains, <br />coupled with inadequate control of subdivision development, makes progress slow <br />and difficult. <br /> <br />The major limitations of current practices in engineering and design are: <br />(1) difficulties in formulating accurate relationships between precipitation and <br />runoff due to an insufficient understanding of hydrologic processes; (2) lack of <br />satisfactory field data and/or analysis of accumulated data; and (3) impediments <br />in using available data to produce optimum designs of integrated stormwater system~. <br />Additionally, the hydraulics of storm sewer networks and the rivers into which they <br />flow are very complicated. More knowledge and experience are needed by most engi- <br />neers involved in urban drainage design to produce successful drainage and flood <br />control systems that minimize costs and protect nature and man. <br /> <br />Impediments in Metropolitan Areas <br /> <br />Metropolitan areas without a drainage district or other central coordinating <br />agency are hampered in providing uniform and timely solutions to problems of flood- <br />ing and drainage. There is great difficulty in coordinating the plans of the mlUlY <br />satellite governments and agencies in such areas with those of the central city <br />and with each other. Also, district agencies usually do not serve an "entire" <br />metropolitan area. Metropolitan areas located along flooding rivers often suffer <br />from a similar lack of coordination in planning and action. Some are fortunate in <br />having river basin commissions which have planning coordination as one of their <br />principal functions. Although there are may excellent metropolitan and/or regional <br /> <br />5 <br />