My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03407
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:11 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:44:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Stormwater Management in the United States - A Study of Intsitutionl Problems, Solutions and Impacts
Date
9/1/1980
Prepared By
Office of Water Research and Technology
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Of concern in some places is the maintaining of a sufficient, potable under- <br />ground water supply at all times. Any actions or events that may threaten either <br />water quality or available quantities are factors demanding attention. Man's land <br />development activities that cause increases in runoff flows can produce interrup- <br />tions of, and a lessening of, the natural process of groundwater recharge. Thus, <br />uncontrolled land development, combined with increased groundwater withdrawal, can <br />produce continual, serious lowering of the natural groundwater table, particularly <br />during periods of drought. As a result, the water supply available for consumption <br />by humans, domestic animals, trees and other flora, and fauna is often insufficient. <br />This may require importation of potable water from other sources. <br /> <br />Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />Attitudes <br /> <br />After conducting interviews for the study, it became evident that many areas of <br />the United States have similar problems in stormwater management. Professional <br />staffs and elected officials of most public agencies give stormwater management a <br />much higher priority than in previous years, primarily because of water pollution, <br />flooding and soil erosion problems and the increase in damages and inconvenience <br />occurring in recent years. However, some officials are more interested in and re- <br />sponsive to broad, social-type projects that can be seen, used and appreciated by <br />the voters on a regular basis, rather than stormwater projects which usually offer <br />direct benefits to only a small percentage of the voters. Unfortunately, taxpayers <br />give areawide stormwater management programs a low priority, excepting those who <br />will receive "direct" benefits. <br /> <br />Fortunately, Congressional leaders and federal officials have evidenced a <br />healthy concern for providing facilities for control of flooding and pollution. <br />The Congress enacted the National Reclamation Act of 1902 to combat floods and <br />droughts and reclaim arid lands, and long ago it gave responsibilities to the <br />United States Corps of Engineers for navigation and flood control. In recent years, <br />it enacted legislation and appropriated funds to help control the pollution of our <br />nation's waters; and the National Flood Insurance Program was established by Con- <br />gressional acts and appropriations. In addition, the Congress has acted to restrict <br />federal guarantees, grants and loans of federal funds to state and local governments <br />for land development, contingent upon local adoption and enforcement of environ- <br />mental regulations. The federal intent is to limit potential hazards, damages, and <br />economic losses from flooding and pollution in urbanizing areas, and protect natural <br />environments. <br /> <br />Priorities and Goals of Public Agencies <br /> <br />Perspectives of public agencies concerning needs and priorities for stormwater <br />control differ. Agencies located in the eastern states view "improvement in the <br />wet weather quality of water bodies" as their highest priority need in stormwater <br />control. However, western public agencies, located in regions characterized by <br />less-dense populations, light industry and agriculture, regard "flood control" as <br />their top priority. Generally, in these places, west of the Mississippi River, <br />water pollution control is given low priority. Conversely, many agencies east of <br />the Mississippi rank flood control as one of their lower priority needs. Reduc- <br />tion of suspended solids in water bodies--by controlling soil erosion--was seen as <br />a high priority need of agencies, irrespective of location. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.