Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Constitutionality <br /> <br />Prior to passage or amendment of floodplain regulations by the <br />local governing body, the floodplain administrator will need to be <br />sure that the governing body is empowered to so regulate, State <br />enabling legislation (i.e., the legislation whereby the State gives local <br />governments the power to implement certain regulations), which is <br />derived from the State constitution. allows a community to regulate <br />and control the actions of individuals to the degree reasonable and <br />necessary to guard public health, safety, or the general welfare of the <br />community. The power of local governments to enact such <br />regulations is called the "police power.'" <br />The use of police power has been challenged by some private land- <br />owners. Generally the basis of the challenge has been a claim that <br />the regulations have served purposes other than the protection of <br />public health, safety, or welfare. A basic condition that local flood- <br />plain regulations must meet in order to be enforceable is that they <br />not unreasonably interfere with citizens' constitutional rights. <br />In some communities property owners have claimed that, in fact, <br />regulations have so restricted their constitutional rights that a "tak- <br />ing" of private property has occurred. "Taking" means that restric- <br />tions on the use of land are such as to leave no reasonable use <br />available to the property owner while denying him just compensation <br />for the loss of the use of the land. Several legal cases have <br />addressed the issue of taking and the question of what constitutes <br />"reasonable use." These cases have led to the position that "reason- <br />able use" does not necessarily mean the highest use of the property. <br /> <br />Statutory Authority The entity adopting floodplain or wetland regulations <br /> must be authorized to do so by general or speCific en. <br /> abling act or home rule powers. <br />Procedural Regularity Statutory procedures for adoption and administration <br /> of an ordinance must be strictly followed. <br />Proper Goals Regulations must serve legitimate goals and objectives <br /> as exercises of the public police power. <br />Reasonableness Regulations must be reasonably related to the stated <br /> goals and tend to accomplish them. <br />The Taking Issue Regulations must not "take" private land for public pur. <br /> poses without payment of just compensation. <br />Equal Protection Regulations must not discriminate unreasonably or ar- <br /> bitrarily among different property owners. <br />Vagueness Standards for issuing permits and other administrative <br /> actions must be clear and definite. <br /> <br />REGULATORY GUIDELINES <br /> <br />The "Pinpoint Approach" <br /> <br />The approach of testing the way a law deals with the individual <br />application rather than testing the whole statute results from two <br />rulings of the United States Supreme Court on zoning regulations. In <br />these cases the court ruled that zoning regulations were a legal <br />application of police power, and that even though an ordinance is <br />valid in a general sense, it can be attacked when applied to particular <br />lands. This is the "pinpoint" approach. under which findings of <br />invalidity applicable to one property may not apply to the adjoining <br />property. <br />Under the "pinpoint" approach a property owner can concede the <br />general validity of floodplain regulations but challenge their con- <br />stitutionality as applied to his land. He can claim they are arbitrary or <br />capricious or claim that they take his property without just <br />compensation.2 <br />8 <br />