Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER 2 <br />lEGAL ASPECTS OF: FlOO[),. <br />PLAIN MANAGEMEI~T <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />This chapter provides a floodplain manager with an introduction to <br />':he major legal concepts which may be encountered when develop- <br />,ng, implementing, and administering a floodplain management pro- <br />qram. It is not a substitute for legal advice. When legal questions <br />arise, professionalle(lal guidance should be obtained. <br /> <br />Federal and State Legislaltion <br /> <br />The evolution of Federal flood-related legislation tlas brought about <br />"n increasing emphasis on non-structural measures and flood hazard <br />l1itigation activities. Congmss enacted the first Flood Control Act in <br />1917, That Act specifically charged the U.s. Army Corps of Engineers <br />'Nith responsibility for some flood control projects on the Mississippi <br />and Sacramento F1ivers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts expanded <br />the Corps' authorities and responsibilities with regard to flood control <br />Jrojects and activities for specifiC communities. Through those <br />authorities the Corps is designated a role in flood control projects <br />Jefore a flood, in flood fights during a flood, and in a clean-up after a <br />flood. <br /> <br />In 1968, the National Flood Insurance Program was created to pro- <br />{ide flood insurance at affordable rates upon the condition that <br />l1ember communities institute floodplain management programs, In <br />1973 the program was expanded by requiring flood insurance on pro- <br />Jerties directly or indirectly financed by federal enlities and by mak- <br />ng participation in Hle NFII' a requirement for federal disaster <br />assistance to local communities. <br />The focus of State and Federal legislation has been to leave a role <br />"or local governments to establish local programs. Federal legislation <br />Jrovides local governments with several kinds of assistance--i.e., <br />~orps projects and technical assistance. the NFIP, disaster <br />assistance--and it specifies some conditions local !lOVernments must <br />l1eet to receive such assistance. It leaves responsibility for managing <br />floodplains with local government. Similarly Colorado legislation also <br />Greates floodplain management programs and provides local <br />'~overnments with the authorities for floodplain management but has <br />'eft the responsibility for managing floodplains with local <br />'~overnments. <br />The concept of tile 1 OO-year floodplain is used throughout this <br />l1anual. It was first adopted by the State of Colorado as part of Sec- <br />tion 24-65-105, CRS 1973, as amended. whereby the Colorado Land <br />Use Commission was charged with designating "critical areas in the <br />state where a one hundred-year (storm return frequency) floodway <br />should be identified,.. ," Section 24-65.1-103 defined a floodplain as <br />an area "subject to floodin~1 as a result of the occurrence of an inter. <br />l1ediate regional flood. , ,:' Section 24'65.1-403(3)(b) requires <br />designation and approval of a floodplain by the Colorado Water Con- <br />servation Soard (CWeS) prior to regulation by a local government. <br /> <br />Legal Principles <br /> <br />The most frequently used tool of floodplain mana(lement is flood- <br />Jlain regulations. One of the most common concerns of local officials <br />adopting and enforcing such regulations is the possibility of legal <br />Ghallenges to their actions. This section will address that concern by <br />discussing generally, 1) the legal basis for most floodplain <br />-egulations and 2) the potential types of legal attacks on those <br />-egulations. <br /> <br />7 <br />