Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />From: wade.thornburg@Wgint.com [mailto:wade.thornburq@Wqint.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:53 PM <br />To: Carroll, Charlie <br />Subject: Shell Comments on the Maul Reservoir Proposal <br /> <br />5. The proposed reservoir footprint would include more acreage than <br />currently mapped by the 100-year floodplain. Thercfore, land use would be <br />limited on a greater area. <br /> <br />6. Designers should note that the channel below the current dam has been <br />plugged so that outlet flows are div'erted into the original channel. Shell <br />has plans to fill the entire length of straightened channel if the current <br />diverted flows prove to be beneficial to groundwater treatment and habitat <br /> <br />Shell comments on the Maul Reservoir proposal: <br /> <br />7. Much of the area east of Peoria Street to be effected by the proposed <br />reservoir is currently dominated by weedy vegetation. Construction of the <br />reservoir would provide the opportunity to improve the appearance and <br />habitat of the area. <br /> <br />1. Two monitoring wells in MfA's long-term groundwater monitoring program <br />(wells 37074 and 37083) are located within or near the downstream toe of <br />the proposed dam. They will need to be protected or replaced by the UDFCD. <br />If the existing wells cannot be retained, they must be closed properly <br />according to Colorado water well construction and abandonment regulations <br />(2 CCR 402-2). <br /> <br />Call if you have questions (303-853-3975). Thanks. <br /> <br />2. Five monitoring wells in RJ\1A's long-term groundwater monitoring program <br />(37081, 37318, 37323, 37369, and 37389) are located within the arca of the <br />'1 OO-year water surface. Their top of casing (TOC) elevations are lower <br />than the maximum water surface elevation of 5138 ft.. The TOC elevations <br />range from 5124.9 to 5129.6 ft. Consequently, it would not be practical to <br />cxtcnd them above 5138 ft One of the wells (37369) would be inundated by <br />the estimated water surface elevation associated with a lO-year storm <br />event Water tight well seals should be provided by the UDFCD to prevcnt <br />surface water from entcring the wells during storm events retained by the <br />proposcd darn. RMA pcrsonnel will be responsible for installing the seals. <br />All 5 wells have 4-inch diameter (ID) PVC casings. <br /> <br />3. Between 6 and 10 private water wells are located within the area of the <br />I OO-year water surface. At least some of these wells still are uscd. Any <br />remaining water wells should be located and their status evaluated. The <br />wells should be scaled or closcd to prevent surface water from entering the <br />wells during storm events. Of the six wells where infomlation is <br />available, four are completed in the Arapahoe Formation, one is completed <br />in the Denver Formation, and one is an alluvial well. Completion depths <br />range from about 30 feet for the alluvial well to 575 feet for an ArapalJOc <br />well. <br /> <br />4. The access lane off Peoria Street and a barn on the Shell property would <br />be effected. Both would need to be relocated or demolished. <br />