My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02900
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Community
Commerce City
Basin
South Platte
Title
Lower First Creek and Direct Flow Area 0055 Major Drainageway Planning
Date
5/1/2002
Prepared For
UDFDC
Prepared By
Turner Collie & Braden Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TumerCollie<9Braden Ine. <br /> <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Page 2 of2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Engineers. Planners. Project Managers <br /> <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />. Kevin Curry to transmit aerial photograph with property lines shown. <br />. Discrepancy in flows and volume for Maul Reservoir. Need discussion in text (i.e. 3100 cfs <br />vs. 3700 cfs). <br />. Include existing facilities sheet from alternatives report. <br />. Include discussion in text about current regulatory environment. <br />. Identify Eagle Creek as local drainage contributing 350 cfs. <br />. Index sheet doesn't match individual sheet layouts. <br />. Stream alignments in FHAD don't match OSP. <br />. Need to show easements and rights-of-way. <br />. Re-evaluate use of flumes, siphons, or flow-inlspill-outs. <br />. Preservation of water rights. <br />. Sheet 8 needs to identify problem of Shell's wells. <br />. Cross reference sheets. See redline plans. <br />. Sheet 9 has planned Arsenal trail. Follow-up with Chris Gervais. <br />. 1-76 crossing is critical issue. <br />. If possible realignment of channel to avoid utility relocations. <br />. In areas where proposed channel banks are above existing grade, note fill required on the <br />plans. <br />. Coordinate plans with Phelps existing channel on Sheets 13 & 14. <br />. Are low flow or trickle channels required on tributaries? <br />. Need grade control structures in areas of channel grade breaks. <br />. Make sure maintenance trails are provide for all channels except where there are adjacent <br />roadways. <br />. Chris Gervais to transmit plat for Mountain View Industrial Park. <br />. Note on plans that Belle Creek may be diverting some flows. <br />. The next meeting was scheduled for November 28th at 2:00. <br /> <br />Project: <br /> <br />First Creek FHAD / OSP <br /> <br />Project Number: <br /> <br />35-05096-040 <br /> <br />Meeting Purpose: <br /> <br />Progress and Coordination Meeting <br /> <br />Meeting Place: <br />Date & Time: <br /> <br />Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />October 31,2001,2:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Attendees: <br /> <br />UD&FCD: Bill DeGroot, David Mallory <br />Commerce City: Chris Gervais, Tiffany Snyder; Adams Co: Kevin Curry; <br />RMA: Wade Thornburg <br />TC&B: Tim Masters, Terry Tyrrell, David Jula, Charles Carroll <br /> <br />Minutes by: <br /> <br />Charlie Carroll <br /> <br />Date prepared: November 1,2001 <br /> <br />The final FHAD was submitted and the following items were discussed for the Preliminary <br />Design Report: <br /> <br />. Received written comments from Commerce City and Adams County. <br />. Redline comments were provided by UD&FCD. <br />. The stream reach between the South Platte and Highway No. 85 (between Lafarge and Bell <br />Creek) is an intermediate section that will be completed by a third party. Note on plans and <br />indicate no impact to cost estimate. <br />. Bridge sizes appear extremely large. TC&B to re-evaluate openings. How were the bridges <br />sized? Provide discussion in text. <br />. Check if the railroad bridge is adequate to pass flows (located between O'Brien and Highway <br />No.2). <br />. The area in the proximity of the Lafarge property would be revised to reflect the reclamation <br />plan. <br />. Check for consistency of whether the Birch is tributary to the Arsenal Creek or vice versa. <br />. Need discussion on initial and ultimate development of Maul Reservoir, outlet works, <br />discharges, etc. <br />. Check unit costs. For example, the alternatives report showed $35M vs. $97M in the OSP. <br />. Reference the hydrology report. <br />. Check line weights on drafting. <br />. Typical channel sections should conform to UD&FCD Criteria Manual guidelines. <br />. Need discussion of potential elimination of the Burlington ditch. Note on plans, also. <br /> <br />These meeting minutes constitute our understanding of the items discussed. Please advise <br />concerning any comments or clarifications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.