Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />AGENDA <br /> <br />TurnerColIiec9Braden Inc. <br /> <br />First Creek OSP and FRAn <br />(Progress Meeting) <br />Time: 1:30 PM <br />Date: July 3, 2001 <br />Location: Urban Drainage & Flood Control District <br /> <br />Engineers. Planners. Project l\ttanagers <br /> <br />MEETING l\HNUTES <br /> <br />Project: <br /> <br />First CreekIDF A 0055 FHAD and OSP <br /> <br />Project Number: <br /> <br />35-05096-040 <br /> <br />(1) Introduction <br /> <br />Meeting Purpose: <br /> <br />Project Status and Progress Meeting <br /> <br />Meeting Place: <br />Date & Time: <br /> <br />Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />July 3,2001,1:30 p.m. <br /> <br />(2) Comments from June 27'" meeting <br /> <br />Attendees: <br /> <br />UDFCD: Bill DeGroot, David Mallory <br />TC&B: Alan Potok, Tim Masters, Charles Carroll <br /> <br />(3) Flood Hazard Area Delineation <br /> <br />Minutes by: <br /> <br />Alan Potok <br /> <br />Date prepared: July 3, 2001 <br /> <br />(4) Outfall Systems Plan <br />a. Eagle Creek <br />b. CAST Site <br />c. Detention Basins <br />d. Maul Reservoir <br /> <br />The following items were discussed: <br /> <br />Flood Hazard Area Delineation <br />Alan suggested an understanding of the purpose of the report as being to (1) provide sufficient <br />technical documentation to support a LOMR on First Creek and selected tributaries and (2) <br />provide the community with a set of working drawings that depict flood hazard under existing <br />conditions and also future development conditions assuming no new flood control improvements <br />are in place. <br /> <br />(5) Progress Meetings <br /> <br />The study streams include First Creek, Rolla, Elm, Birch, Arsenal, and Union Pacific tributaries. <br /> <br />(6) Next Meeting! Adjournment <br /> <br />Bill requested that the FUTURE model conditions be submitted first to allow the District to <br />determine whether or not they will want to focus on the EXISTING model. <br /> <br />For determination of the floodway, Bill stated that we should assume no flow split, that is, a <br />downstream discharge of9,OOO cfs (or what is specifically recommended from the model). <br /> <br />UCDFD provided an example of a FHAD (Box Elder Creek) to follow. It is important that the <br />exhibits show a stream orientation. <br /> <br />The 10-year and 100-year events will be shown on the water surface profiles. All storms shall be <br />listed in the tables. <br /> <br />Profile exhibits need to show all existing bridge crossings. <br /> <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />