Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />AGENDA <br /> <br />TumerCelliel6Braden Ine. <br /> <br />(I) <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />(6) <br /> <br />(7) <br /> <br />First Creek OSP and FHAD <br />(2nd Progress Meeting) <br />Time: 1:30 <br />Date: October 5, 1999 <br />Location: Urban Drainage & Flood Control District <br /> <br />Subject: Lower First Creek and Direct <br />Flow Area 0055 Outfall Study <br />Job No.: 35.05096-040 <br /> <br />Place: Urban Drainage and Flood <br />Control District Offices <br />Date & Time: 10/6/99 I :30 PM <br /> <br />Hydrologic Analysis - Status <br /> <br />Attendees: David Mallory (UDFCD) <br />Edward Stafford (Commerce <br />City) <br />David Center (TCB) <br />Tim Kilgannon (Rt'vIA) <br /> <br />Exhibits (draft) for Report <br /> <br />Pre parer: Rick Moser <br /> <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />Bill DeGroot (UDFCD) <br /> <br />Rick Moser (TCB) <br />Daren Duncan (Adams County) <br />Jim Pearce (RNIA) <br /> <br />Date: 10/20/99 <br /> <br />Rainfall Data <br />Unadjusted and Adjusted Depths <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to report on <br />progress on the Outfall Planning and Flood <br />Hazard Area Delineation Study for the lower <br />First Creek watershed. <br /> <br />DFA 55 <br /> <br />Dave C. began the meeting by describing and <br />distributing the hydrologic related drawings that <br />bave been developed to date. Maps were <br />displayed illustrating the study area, soils, land <br />use, sub-watershed designations and SWMM <br />routing elements. <br /> <br />Hydrograph input into First Creek SWMM data set <br />Sub watersheds/Routing into First Creek SWMM data set <br />Problems Verifying input Hydrograph <br /> <br />Contact List <br /> <br />Dave pointed out that the subwatershed <br />boundaries used in the MartinlMartin Study <br />were checked against the two-foot contour <br />interval mapping provided by the County. The <br />boundaries looked reasonable and no changes <br />were made to the subwatershed delineations. <br />RMA personnel commented on both the existing <br />and future percent impervious values assigned to <br />the RMA. Based on these comments TCB will <br />revise the percent impervious drawin~s along <br />with the appropriate subwatershed CUHP <br />characteristics to reflect a lower percent <br />imperviousness for both the existing and future <br />land use condition. <br /> <br />Next Meeting/Adjournment <br /> <br />The existing drainage system SWMM <br />connectivity diagram will be revised to remove <br />all detention elements (except 3 that are <br /> <br />existing). DFA 0055 was added to the <br />subwatershed delineation exhibit and the <br />SWMM connectivity diagram to reflect <br />integration of this area into the First Creek <br />hydrologic model. <br /> <br />Rick M. then presented rainfall depths and <br />cJ.urations that will be used in the hydrologic <br />modeling. A six-hour duration will be used for <br />both the adjusted and unadjusted rainfall <br />scenarios. <br /> <br />A comparison ofTCB modeling results against <br />the hydrograph values found in the <br />Martinllvlartin SWMM tile for DFA 0055 was <br />presented. The comparison was reasonable for <br />the I O.yr event. However, for the 100-yr event, <br />the TCB results were quite different than the <br />MartinlMartin SWNIM hydrograph. <br /> <br />The study contact list was expanded to include <br />additional individuals to infonn about the <br />project and send meeting minutes to. <br /> <br />Meeting Schedule <br />The next seheduled meetino is November 3 <br />o , <br />1999 at I :30PM at the UDFCD. TC&B will <br />present the draft hydrology report. <br /> <br />Distribution: Study Contact List <br />