My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02879
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:17:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Water Project Construction Loan Program
Date
8/1/1994
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In those cases where capital costs for alternatives are spread out over a long period of <br />time, the present value of the costs should be calculated before calculating annual costs. <br />The present value of the costs should be calculated to the same time base (year) for each <br />alternative. <br /> <br />For example, an alternative may involve an ir.umediate capital expenditure for the <br />construction of a pumping plant and a major expansion of the pumping plant ten years <br />from now. The present value of the plant expansion scheduled ten years in the future <br />must be calculated before it is added to the cost of the initial plant construction for <br />purposes of cost comparisons. <br /> <br />The cost per unit of output for each alternative should be calculated by dividing the <br />annual cost by the estimated annual output. For water supply projects (both agricultural <br />and municipal), the unit costs should be expressed in terms of dollars per acre-foot of <br />yield per year. For hydropower projects, unit costs should be given in terms of cents or <br />mills per kilowatt-hour of energy produced. <br /> <br />Multi-purpose projects will require a cost allocation to each project purpose. The cost <br />per unit of output is then calculated separately for each project purpose using the results <br />of the cost allocation. The assumptions and methodology used for the cost allocation <br />should be provided in the study report <br /> <br />3. Impacts <br /> <br />For each alternative considered, three categories of potential impacts should be analyzed: <br />impacts on the man-made environment; impacts on the natural environment; and impacts <br />on the existing social structure. <br /> <br />The level of detail for these analyses will depend upon the scope of the study and the size <br />and location of the proposed project. In general, more detailed analyses will be required <br />for feasibility studies while reconnaissance studies will utilize mostly existing data. <br /> <br />Where federal lands or federal permits are involved, an environmental assessment (EA) <br />or environmental impact statement (EIS) may be required. In these cases, the scope of <br />the EA or EIS will be prepared in consultation with the appropriate federal agency. <br /> <br />Studies for proposed projects which do not require an EA or EIS will utilize the follow:ing <br />outline for the assessment of both long-term and short-term impacts: <br /> <br />a. Impacts on the Man-Made Environment <br /> <br />. Number of dwelling units, commercial facilities, and other <br />structures to be removed or relocated, <br /> <br />. Miles of utilities and miles of roadway to be relocated, <br /> <br />B-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.