My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02603
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:54 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:00:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Garfield
Community
Glenwood Springs
Stream Name
Roaring Fork River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Debris Flow Costs & Inventory of City of Glenwood Springs Area July 10,1928 Flood Debris Flow
Date
5/1/1986
Prepared For
Glenwood Springs
Prepared By
Mount Sopris SCS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Since the City of Glenwood Springs receives a large portion of revenue from <br />tourist dollars, anything detracting from the scenic view and use of the area <br />can lose some of those dollars. News accounts of the damages and clean-up <br />necessary undoubtedly caused some vacationers to look elsewhere for their summer <br />outings. <br />With fishing as one of the outdoor recreation activities for tourists in <br />the area, the death of fish in the Roaring Fork River due to the flash flooding <br />was another economic loss. <br />According to the Colorado Division of Wildlife, fish died for two reasons, <br />suffocation from mud and debris in the water, and stress caused by combating <br />high water and its velocity, Whitefish, which are strei'lll bottom feeders, were <br />subject to heavy rock movement, The stocked trout do not have the muscle <br />development of German Brown for river-bred populations so they don't have the <br />power to fight back in swift and cluttered waters. <br />In a normal year, the DOW would have restocked the river immediately but <br />because it was a drought year in 1977, they waited until 1978. Marvin Smith of <br />the DOW estimated it would take from 4 days to a week for the river to clean <br />since small tributaries high on the rivers also had had mud and debris flows. <br />Recreation days lost from July to September 15 were over 50 because of the <br />downpour but no figures for lost tourist dollars were gathered. <br />In interviewing numerous residents, interesting sidelights of losses are <br />mentioned many times: <br />The number of shoes and gloves which were ruined. The clothesl ines and <br />poles and trellises which had to be replaced in all parts of the covered areas; <br />the need to purchase extra equipment for clean-up, such as shovels, trash cans, <br />wheelbarrows; 1 andscaping acquired over many years that was not repl aced because <br />of the cost to replace everything at one time. Clothes washers, freezers, <br />electrical appl iances with damaged motors. Houses needed to be scrubbed and <br />repainted, carpets cleaned, drapes cleaned, cars washed and repaired for such <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.