My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02514
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:57:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Design Guidelines for Flood Damage Reduction
Date
10/1/1981
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />mined unless relocation is feasible Older buildings often <br />have structural limitations and seldom prove to be feasi- <br />ble candidates for elevation above the base flood level <br />Additional constraints arise if the project involves a histor- <br />ical building that cannot be altered to the extent of reduc- <br />ing its historical integrity. All such issues affecting existing <br />buildings must be analyzed in relation to strategies for <br />flood damage reduction <br />IJ;pe of Use. ResidentiaL commercial, industriaL and <br />public building projects have different factors influencing <br />the choice of techniques for flood damage reduction <br />First, in meeting National Flood Insurance Program <br />(NFIP) regulations, residential structures are required to <br />be above the base flood elevations, while other uses have <br />the option of being either elevated or floodproofed to the <br />same level Second, the type of use also influences site de- <br />cisions. For example, the use of clustering techniques will <br />be different for residential buildings than for commercial <br />or industrial uses. Third, the type of use can affect the site <br />layout in terms of required access to buildings during <br />flooding, and will influence the methods for controlling <br />water runoff <br />Finally, different uses influence floodproofing tech- <br />niques. Waterproofing is generally more relevant for com- <br />mercial buildings that have easily damaged materials and <br />finishes, valuable records, and vulnerable contents. Wet <br />floodproofing might be more appropriate for an indus- <br />trial building that is easier to clean and has more easily <br />protected contents- <br /> <br />Applicability of Desiaft 'Ieduti'lues <br />As previous chapters have made clear, buildings ideally <br />will be located so that they are not subject to flooding. Yet <br />there are still a variety of situations where this ideal is im- <br />practical or unnecessary and that call for special measures <br />to reduce flood damage For example, when: <br />. The project site is not itself in a flood hazard area, <br />but is where development might increase flood levels <br />elsewhere <br />. Buildings are located in a fringe area that is subject <br />to only mild flooding <br />. Buildings can be cost-effectively floodproofed to <br />achieve an acceptable level of safety. <br />. The project includes existing buildings that, due to <br />historical or economic significance or an existing <br />urban infrastructure, must remain in a flood-prone <br />area <br />. Existing buildings are to be removed from a flood <br />hazard area, but the period of amortization will re- <br />quire temporary protection <br /> <br />4 Pi <br /> <br /> <br />u.s. Army Corps of Engmeers <br /> <br />55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.