Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />The Honorable Bill Tedesko, Mayor <br />July 19, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />There was, however, another change that was important to several of those in <br />attendance at the June 23 meeting, That change was that the area of shallow flooding to <br />the west of the Oak Creek channel, which includes the subject property, is now shown as <br />experiencing up to 3 feet of overbank flooding, as opposed to a lesser depth on the previous <br />draft. Obviously the depth of flooding will affect the need for fill, grading, or installation <br />of drainage and flood control improvements to mitigate the flood hazard on the site, <br /> <br />At this point I want to stress that the work by Love and Associates is still in draft <br />form, It has not been through the review and approval process at FEMA's headquarters in <br />Washington, D,C. That means that decisions regarding the development of that site cannot <br />be made simply by reviewing the draft floodplain maps and using those maps as the basis <br />for a design, The draft information should definitely be considered in arriving at an <br />engineering design for the site, but the official maps are the Florence FlS for the "old" part <br />of the City and the Fremont County FlS for the newly annexed part of the City. Given the <br />nature of the floodplain in Florence, I would strongly advise any developer in that area to <br />retain a professional engineer familiar with floodplain hydraulics so that engineer can <br />properly utilize the information in all three studies, <br /> <br />Steps to be Taken by the City of Florence <br /> <br />Two steps need to be taken by the City and the developers to assure compliance with <br />the City's adopted floodplain ordinance and to assure that the final product of FEMA's <br />current restudy effort is the most accurate floodplain available for Florence, First, the City <br />must obtain from the developers an application with all of the supporting engineering <br />documentation needed for a floodplain development permit. Essentially any activity in an <br />identified floodplain in a community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program <br />must be preceded by an approved floodplain development permit issued by the local <br />government. The work performed on the site so far has been done without a permit, which <br />is a violation of the City's floodplain regulations. No further work should take place on the <br />site until a permit has been issued, <br /> <br /> <br />Second, since the floodplain has been substantially altered, the developers should <br />submit to the City all of the engineering information that would be necessary for the City <br />to be able to request from FEMA a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), The LOMR is the <br />way that a floodplain delineation is officially changed by FEMA to reflect physical or other <br />alterations to the floodplain, The draft analysis by Love & Associates does not reflect the <br />changed topography at the site. As a result, it does not adequately represent flood <br />conditions at the site. Given that change in floodplain topography and the apparent desire <br />by the City and the developers to remove the floodplain designation from the site, a LOMR <br />submittal seems to be the best way to meet everyone's needs. <br />