Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />VI-1 <br /> <br />SECT! ON VI <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> <br />A structural European channel is to be constructed in 2.3 miles of the <br />creek bottom, most of which is in Ralston Creek. The European channel is <br />generally designed for carrying the 10-year flood, however, because of <br />normal freeboard and optimi zed depth of the channel bottom, the 10-year <br />design channel will carry most of the 100-year flood when running bank full <br />and without any allowance for debris plugging. A low flow channel similar <br />to the one proposed for grass lined sections is included here. <br /> <br />The pre 1 imi nary des i gn of the Ral ston, Van Bi bber and Leyden Creeks flood <br />control project is described in this section of the report. <br /> <br />The flood control project presented in this report includes 12.7 miles of <br />creek channel, 9 street bridges requiring improvements to pass the 100-year <br />flood, 10 bridges to be improved to pass the 10-year flood, and 7 bridges <br />which require no modifications. <br /> <br />A box cul vert is des i gned for Van Bi bber Creek through the hi gh val ue <br />Arvada Pl aza Shoppi ng Center. With the upstream Oak Street detention <br />facil iti es, the box cul vert wi 11 convey the laO-year f1 ood on Van Bibber <br />Creek of 1,300 cfs. Without the detention storage, the 100-year flood <br />would be 2,600 cfs at the Arvada Plaza Shopping Center. This would result <br />in residual flooding because the capacity of the box culverts would be ex- <br />ceeded. <br /> <br />The design calls for a major rehabilitation of the Leyden Lake embankment <br />and spillway to reduce the risk to the downstream urban area from potential <br />dam failure. The dam is presently classified as moderate hazard, but is <br />being treated as a high hazard structure as a result of identified inade- <br />quaci es. <br /> <br />Multi-use/multi-purpose detention storage facilities have been designed for <br />Van Bibber Creek to store up to 187 acre-feet of flood waters during a 100- <br />year flood. These facilities are known as the Oak Street detention facili- <br />ties. The multi-use/multi-purpose relates to their use as soccer fields <br />for recreational purposes. <br /> <br />To control erosion and limit velocities of flood waters, 16 drop structures <br />are proposed. The drop structures would be permanent, probably of <br />concrete, grouted rock or grouted rubble. Gabions shoul d not be used <br />because of the tendency for erosion of the wire with subsequent corrosion <br />and 1 ater fail ure of the baskets. Ni ne drops are on Ralston Creek and 7 <br />drops are on Van Bibber Creek. <br /> <br />Of the 12.8 miles of creek channel involved, 8.1 miles will remain unim- <br />proved. Here, the 1 ands adj acent to the channel wi 11 be allowed to flood <br />as they have historically. The floodplain and floodway should be strictly <br />regul ated by Arvada or Jefferson County and floodpl ain management methods <br />will be practical, including flood warning, education, flood insurance, <br />flood proofing and other techniques. <br /> <br />The preliminary design includes four canal crossing structures which are <br />part of the improvements. These are for the Manhart Ditch, the Reno-Juchem <br />Ditch, Farmers Highline Canal and the Croke Canal in the study area. <br /> <br />There are 1.9 miles of channel which are to be shaped into an attractive <br />channel with grass lining and a low flow channel which simulates the exist- <br />i ng low flow section. Thi s wi 11 enhance the reestab 1 i shment of ri pari an <br />plants and wildlife. <br /> <br />It is recommended that constructi on generally begi n at the lower end of <br />each creek and proceed upstream to reduce the flood 1 i abil ity of the gov- <br />ernmental agencies. Lower Ralston should be accomplished first. It is <br />prudent to not improve capacities upstream first because this may cause <br />higher peak flows to occur downstream of where a "bottleneck" now exists. <br />