Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />VI-2 <br /> <br />The proposed reservoir improvements and detention facility construction may <br />be undertaken at any time. Because they retard flood waters, their up- <br />stream location should not increase the liability of the governments. <br /> <br />construction costs but they are most heavily populated and im- <br />provements would be highly visible to the community. <br /> <br />The recommended pri ority of improvements shoul d be cons i stent with the <br />aforementioned guidelines. The plan of implementation distributes the cost <br />of improvements and therefore mi nimi zes the impacts on the budgets of the <br />sponsors. It al so prov i des a systematic approach to the reduct i on of <br />potential damages along Ralson, Van Bibber and Leyden Creeks. <br /> <br />5. Improve the upstream reaches of Leyden Creek and Van Bibber Creek <br />as development in these reaches occurs. This also provides the <br />opportunity for cost participation by those developing the pro- <br />perties which would be benefited. <br /> <br />1. Improve Leyden Lake. This maintains the status quo with respect <br />to flood flows and insures the continued safety of the facility. <br /> <br />6. When multi-purpose funds are available, the soccer field complex <br />property should be purchased and the Oak Street detention facility <br />should be constructed. This would provide an increased level of <br />protection through the shopping center area and would preserve the <br />open space/recreational uses presently occurring on the site. <br />This type of use is an ideal multi-use application for flood prone <br />properties. <br /> <br />2. Construct the improvements recommended through the Arvada Shopping <br />Center and the confl uence area of Ral ston and Van Bibber Creeks. <br />This area is subject to the most intense damages in the entire <br />study. This would eliminate damages from this area for all events <br />less than the 15-year event assuming a fully developed upstream <br />basin. <br /> <br />7. The 58th Avenue and Eldridge area should be improved as recom- <br />mended. This would correct existing problems due to imprudent <br />development and woul d red uce further problems associ ated with <br />future developments. <br /> <br />3. Implement a right-of-way acquisition program for the downstream <br />reach of Ralston Creek, from Old Wadsworth to Clear Creek, to <br />purchase property along the proposed improvements as they become <br />available. This would distribute these costs over time and would <br />enhance the affordability of the construction of improvements. It <br />would also help to mitigate any potential increased hazard which <br />might occur as a result of upstream improvements. As additional <br />funds become available and the flood hazard justifies expendi- <br />tures, the lower reacheS of the proposed Ralston Creek improve- <br />ments can be constructed. <br /> <br />The overall design in terms of 1985 dollars, would result in a project cost <br />of approximately $33,000,000 including right-of-way and contingencies. <br />This is a preliminary cost estimate. No guarantees are associated with the <br />est imated costs even though the cost est imate represent best avail ab 1 e <br />knowl edge. <br /> <br />Table VI-1 is attached which presents a quiCk reference source for major <br />project features of the preliminary design. <br /> <br />4. Begin a phased construction program for the reach of Ral ston Creek <br />from Van Bibber Creek to Leyden Creek and on Leyden Creek from <br />Ral ston Creek to the Arvada city limits. These reaches have high <br /> <br />The present prel iminary design of the proposed flood control project dif- <br />fers substantially from the earlier plans developed by Wright-McLaughlin <br />Engineers and Frasier and Gingery Engineers about ten years ago. The 1985 <br />design was able to call upon features of the former engineering work to <br />optimize the design strategy. For instance in 1977 it was not known that <br />Leyden Lake was unsafe and that it was bei ng re-eval uated for poss ib 1 e <br />