My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01619
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01619
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:10:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
320
County
Jefferson
Community
Arvada
Stream Name
Lower Ralston, Van Bibber, Leyden Creeks
Title
Major Drainageway Planning
Date
2/1/1986
Prepared For
Arvada
Prepared By
UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />v-a <br /> <br />vides. The longer the warning time, the more possibilities there are for <br />preventing damage. Warning systems are essential for some types of flood <br />protection and require action immediately before a flood to make it effec- <br />tive. <br /> <br />The cost of a flood warning system can vary from a minimal amount to a <br />significant amount depending on the degree of sophistication desired. A <br />system using non-recording gages and sensors and vol unteers can be very <br />inexpensive. A sophisticated system with automatic sensors, and real time <br />computer predictions, and flood inundation maps which can be related to the <br />flood peak flow predicted could be quite expensive. <br /> <br />In addition, a warning and evacuation plan must include maintenance and <br />management of vital services (telephone, sewage, water, traffic, hospitals, <br />and police and fire protection) before, during, and after the flood and <br />during post flood re-occupation and recovery. The crucial feature of any <br />flood warning system is a reliable method for transmitting the alarm to the <br />publ ic. A method must be chosen which wi 11 be immedi ately understood by <br />the public and not confused with other sorts of warnings. For example, use <br />of Civil Defense sirens could be confused with other sorts of warnings. On <br />the other hand, a warning given over radio or television stations may not <br />be received by anyone if the flood occurs in the middle of the night. The <br />success of a flood warning system also depends on knowledge of the exact <br />areas that will be flooded by a flood of the predicted size. <br /> <br />A flood warning system should be developed and implemented in the Ralston/ <br />Leyden/Van Bibber drai nage bas in. The system chosen shoul d be based on <br />defined needs along the drainageways and the budget available to implement <br />the system. <br /> <br />In the case of Ralston Creek, a warning system would need to rely on pre- <br />cipitation gages and water level sensors located upstream of the hogback in <br />order to provide a meaningful amount of warning time. The precipitation <br />gages and water level sensors could be monitored by radio by the police or <br />by a system of volunteers. In any case, it is necessary to have frequent <br />drills to insure the adequacy of the systems operation. It would be essen- <br />tial for the person in charge of disseminating the warnings to be cautious <br />about false alarms since a number of false alarms can result in people <br />ignoring future warnings. <br /> <br />The National Weather Service provides flood warnings for localities based <br />on the occurrence of intense rainfall cells. This sort of warning could be <br />useful for saving lives in flash floods resulting from rainfall downstream <br />of the hogback on Ralston Creek. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.