My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00850
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
31
County
Arapahoe
Community
Unincorporated Arapahoe County
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Little Dry Creek, Report, Volume I
Date
2/1/1974
Designation Date
6/1/1974
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />zoidal concrete-lined channel designed to carry 4,700 cubic feet per <br /> <br /> <br />second. The channel design was selected to reduce right-of-way acqui- <br /> <br /> <br />sition. Two bridges that presently cross the Little Dry Creek channel <br /> <br /> <br />may require modification to accomodate the new channel. Other, more <br /> <br /> <br />costly, treatment of the channel section may eventually be selected for <br /> <br /> <br />aesthetic reasons, particularly in connection with a downtown planning <br /> <br /> <br />effort now in progress. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Conduits. The existing Little Dry Creek conduit through Cinderella City <br /> <br /> <br />in Englewood and its proposed extension up to Sherman Street are discussed <br /> <br /> <br />in detail in the Cinderella Conduit chapter of this report. The conduit <br /> <br /> <br />is shown on Drawing 4. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A number of road crossings are required across waterways in the basin. These <br />crossings have been included in the waterway reaches where improvements <br />such as channelization, major conduits or other improvements are proposed. <br />The locations of the crossings are shown on the drawings that show <br />the proposed improvements. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The final design of other crossing structures that may be required as <br />urbanization of the area progresses are not considered to be a part of <br />this study. However, discharge, elevations, and approximate waterway <br />areas are given for 25 and 100-year frequency floods at a number of <br />points in the basin. This data is presented to facilitate the future <br />design of road crossing structures. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A third category of structures are those for which there is a present <br /> <br /> <br />need in terms of public convenience and safety, and public services, <br /> <br /> <br />such as fire and police protection, but whose costs exceed benefits <br /> <br /> <br />which can be calculated from flood damage estimates. These structures <br /> <br /> <br />are listed in Table 9, which follows. Some of them are shown on Drawing <br /> <br />36. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-59- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.