Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />As can be seen, the difference in costs between the Interim <br />Report and the Final Report cost estimate on the channel is <br />considerably different. We attribute this to lack of detailed <br />information at the time of the Interim Report cost estimate. <br />Rip rap cost, drop structure cost and excavation cost, because <br />of the Denver Water Board conduit, are the contributing factors <br />for the increased costs. This increase in cost, however, will <br />not change the alternate selection for the final design as in <br />all alternates, the channel costs would have to be increased <br />by the difference shown on the previous tables. <br /> <br />TABLE X <br />COST COMPARISONS <br /> <br />Main Stream <br /> <br />Items <br /> <br />Interim Report Final Report <br />$ 10,000 $110,400 <br />158,000 150,200 <br />o 10,400 <br />108,400 <br /> <br />Channel <br /> <br />Street & Crossing Improvements <br /> <br />Rights-of-Way <br />40% Contingency <br />Total <br /> <br />$168,000 <br /> <br />$379,400 <br /> <br />Items <br /> <br />South Tributary <br />Interim Report Final Report <br /> <br />Street & Crossing Improvements <br /> <br />o <br />$130,000 <br />o <br /> <br />$ 8,000 <br />94,700 <br /> <br />Channel <br /> <br />Rights-of-Way <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />$130,000 <br /> <br />41,100 <br />$143,800 <br /> <br />40% Contingency <br />Total <br /> <br />X-3 <br />