Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 2- <br /> <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Review and Approval of September 11 - U, 2002 Meeting Minutes <br />Tape l, Track 1 22:00-25:00 <br />Action: A motion was made by Greg Hoskin and seconded by Ray Wright to accept <br />the minutes as submitted. Approved 10-0. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Directors' Reports - DNR, DOA, SEO, CWCB, DOW, WPA <br />Tape l, Track 1 <br />Tape 2, Track 1 <br />Action: Information items; no formal action taken. <br /> <br />25:00 - 1 :49:00 <br />o - 5 :33 <br /> <br />4. Approve and/or Remove Items from the Consent Agenda <br />Tape 2, Track 1, . 05:33 -7:00 <br />Action: A motion was made by Ray Wright and seconded by David Smith to approve <br />the consent agenda as submitted. Approved lO-O. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Attorney General's Report & Legal Briefing <br />Tape 2, Track l, . 7:00 - 39:27 <br />Action: A motion was made by Greg Walcher with a second by Eric Wilkinson to add <br />for discussion in Executive Session, item number 6i; discussion with the <br />attorney for a discussion of proposed revisions to the Arapahoe Roosevelt <br />National Forest Management Plan. Approved lO-O. <br />Action: A motion was made by Greg fioskin with a second by Keith Catlin to go into <br />Executive Session to discuss agenda items 6a-i. Approved lO-O. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6. Executive Session <br />Tape 2, Track 1, 39:27-41:11 <br />Action: As recommended on the record by Deputy Attorney General Felicity Hannay, <br />Executive Session was not recorded on the basis that the discussion was <br />covered by the Attorney/Client communication privilege. <br /> <br />7. Report from Executive Session <br />Tape 2, Track 2, 0-30:09 <br />Action: A motion was made by Greg Walcher with a second by Carolyn McIntosh <br />regarding item 6i Arapahoe Roosevelt National Forest Service Management <br />Plan, directing legal counsel to verbally notify the National Forest Service <br />followed by a written notification and eventually legal action if necessary, that <br />the State views the Forest Service's action as a blatant violation of the <br />Administrative Procedures A~t as well as the National Environmental Policy <br />Act, and that the Forest Service must withdraw it's proposal, and ifit seeks to <br />amend the Forest ManagemeIj.t Plan that it do so in a correct and legal manner. <br />Approved 10-0. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Stream and Lake Protection Section - Consideration of Proposed 2003 New <br />Appropriation Recommendations in Water Division 3, 5, and 6. <br />Tape 2, Track 2, 30:09-32:48 <br />Action: Information item; no formal action taken. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning an..' d Finance. Stream and Lake proTon <br />w.~,__.~~__ I <br />