My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02552
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/19/2003
Description
Flood Section - Map Modernization Implementation Plan
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-5- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The 64 counties were then divided into four priority groups of 16 each. The highest priority group <br />includes counties that CWCB views as the candidate pool for the first fiscal year. 4 - 8 of those <br />counties may get funding for first year mapping activities, depending on how much money FEMA <br />provides for Colorado. That high priority group includes 16 counties and 97 municipalities, for a <br />total of 113 potential communities for FY'03 mapping activities. The highest priority counties are <br />shown below. Since population and population growth are factors in the scoring system, one would <br />expect significant representation in the highest priority group from Front Range counties. In <br />addition, weighting was given to counties facing potential flood impacts from last summer's <br />wildfires. 7 wildfire-impacted counties (out of 11) are included in the list below. The list is <br />arranged in rough geographic order from northeast to southwest. <br /> <br />Colorado 2003 MMIP <br />Highest Priority Counties FY '03 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />County Name # of municipalities <br /> within county <br />Larimer 6 <br />Weld 26 <br />City and County of Broomfield n.a. <br />Boulder 9 <br />Adams 7 <br />City and County of Denver n.a. <br />Arapahoe 12 <br />Elbert 3 <br />Douglas 4 <br />Park 2 <br />Teller 3 <br />Routt 4 <br />Ea/de 7 <br />Garfield 6 <br />Mesa 5 <br />Rio Grande 3 <br /> <br />At approximately the same time that we are sending this memorandum to every community in <br />Colorado, we will send a more detailed memorandum to those 113 highest priority communities to <br />discuss the specific activities that the CWCB, Urban Drainage (for the Denver metro area) and the <br />communities will need to undertake in anticipation to possible floodplain mapping activities in the <br />various communities during the spring, summer and fall of 2003. Some of those activities are listed <br />below: <br /> <br />I) <br /> <br />The community will review the priority list of specific stream reaches they <br />submitted last summer (if they submitted such a list), or to create such a list if <br />they did not create one. <br />CWCB staff, and, if appropriate, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />staff, will hold county meetings with representatives of all the communities <br />within each county that care to pursue the possibility of floodplain mapping to <br />prepare an initial countywide list of stndy needs for each county. <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Financing. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.