My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02551
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02551
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/11/1965
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />NR. TIPTON: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />r'lR. TIPTON: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />r1R. TIPTON: <br /> <br />Now they take the position, the Upper <br />Basin - the Upper Colorado River Commission <br />and I know it is ttr. Sparks' position - that <br />Arizona on her tributaries, taking the defini- <br />tion of the compact, the Colorado River .is <br />the Colorado River system which includes all <br />the tributaries, that there is being now bene- <br />ficially consumed under the definition of the <br />Supreme Court, considerably more than the 8~ <br />million acre-feet that was apportioned to the <br />Lower Basin. They are consuming all the sur- <br />plus that was destined for Nexico, and proba- <br />bly more too. NO\I/ that's on one tributary <br />largely. That's the Gila River. That is what <br />the position of the Upper Basin is. What the <br />Supreme Court might do, nobody knows how that <br />might be resolved. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />That's not answering your question <br />directly, Ed. I think it is a little more <br />than a matter of bookkeeping. I think it <br />should be bookkeeping though. I think there <br />should be an accounting for all uses in the <br />Lower Basin including tributaries. I think <br />that is perfectly true. <br /> <br />Are there any other questions?" <br /> <br />"But it does not represent an extra <br />million acre-feet of water to be released <br />by the Upper Basin." <br /> <br />"No, it doesn't mean that. Oh, no. It's <br />no burden on the upper Basin at all." <br /> <br />"It's to cure the situation with respect <br />to the tributaries." <br /> <br />"That's right." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"But the tributaries above Lake Head as <br />well as the Gila River. There are tributaries <br />from the Little Colorado River and the river <br />from Utah. They are also in consideration <br />when you are talking about tributaries." <br /> <br />"The tributaries include all the tributaries. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.