My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02546
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02546
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/9/1963
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The investigation which has been underway for <br />the longest period of time is the Basin Review <br />Studies for Flood Control and Water Resources <br />Development in the South Platte Basin. Initial- <br />ly we had directed our attention to evaluating <br />the flood damage potential of the lower basin <br />below Fort Morgan and the potential flood con- <br />trol benefits that could be attributed to the I' <br />Narrows or Weld county sites as a cooperative <br />study with the Bureau of Reclamation. We pro- <br />vided the preliminary answers on the flond <br />control storage requirements and the flood <br />control benefits to the Bureau in 1961. <br /> <br />i' <br /> <br />We have since directed our attention to <br />evaluating the problems of the upper basin and <br />we find at this level of investigation that the <br />principle damage area in the upper basin is in <br />the Denver metropolitan region. By the region <br />I mean, not necessarily Denver itself, but from <br />Kassler on down to Brighton. We find, however, <br />that by the revised methodology we have to use <br />to evaluate the feasibility of a project, that <br />there are significant shifts in the flood dam- <br />age potential and the potential flood control <br />benefits as compared to the study which was <br />completed in 1945. We find also that in order <br />to effectively control floods in this region, <br />the major tributaries must be controlled as <br />well as the upper main stem which requires <br />then, if you are to provide flood control works, <br />construction On the tributaries, channelization <br />through the entire region, or control of the <br />upper main stem and the tributaries. <br /> <br />We find that it is going to be very diffi- <br />cult to achieve feasibility from a flood con- <br />trol standpoint alone because the benefits do <br />not quite equate with the prospective costs of <br />improvements in this era of high-cost improve- <br />ments. However, we are continuing to investi- I'.' <br />gate this problem to evaluate the future <br />growth potential, to evaluate potential future <br />benefits to see whether we can establish feasi- <br />bility for some measures of flood control in <br />the upper basin. vie feel, however, that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.