My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02537
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/17/1958
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />illo <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />next fiscal year, starting July 1, 1959 <br />but for planning purposes, if we are to <br />have two additional people, I must have <br />them in the budget which must be submit- <br />ted thi's week. I,have included in our <br />budget funds for two additional people <br />under grade 19 and grade 14 or somewhere <br />along there, under which grades I thought <br />we could secure people who are already <br />highly trained. The actual positions as <br />such would not go into operation until <br />July 1, 1959 so we would have until that <br />time to firm up the actual use of these <br />two additional people. <br /> <br />Now I don't know that they have to <br />be engineers either. My thinking is not <br />definite on that point but certainly the <br />projects man, that is the Western Slope <br />man, should and must be an engineer be- <br />cause he must review our projects, but the <br />other person, I am not so sure.# <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman I heartily endorse Mr. <br />Peterson's idea that we should have some- <br />one over on the Western Slope that will do <br />this work. I would also like to say that <br />we need somebody to do some of the work <br />on the Eastern Slope. If it is going to <br />take three men instead of two, 1 would like <br />to make that proposal at the present time. <br />I have had the privilege, at Governor <br />McNichols' request, and for this Board, to <br />attend the Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Com- <br />mittee on three occasions. That Missouri <br />Basin project is something like 10 billion <br />dollars. The State-of Colorado has approxi- <br />mately 12% of the area and about the same <br />percentage in population and on the board, <br />including two or three projects that have <br />already been approved, nothing's been done <br />about it. Even including the money that is <br />estimated for loans, we are due for about <br />l~% of the money to be spent. <br /> <br />,Now in addition to that we all know <br />about the Colorado River Basin fund 'that <br />is to be created by power. We have the <br />same thing on the Missouri but actually <br />projects in other states are being con- <br />structed by the Bureau of Reclamation, 85% <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.