My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02537
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/17/1958
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11U3 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It is suggested that you make your room reservations directly <br />with the clerk of the hotel or motel where you desire to stay. <br />Three places for lodging that are close to the Capitol grounds <br />and with which I am familiar are the La Fonda Hotel, La Posada <br />and Desert Inn. The latter two places could be classed as <br />motor hotels; although they are in the heart of town. <br /> <br />/s/ IVAL V. GOSLIN <br />IvaI V. Goslin <br />Engineer-Secretary <br /> <br />IVG:cw <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"I think, in regard to Mr. Peterson's <br />motion, that as a matter of protocol, our <br />resolution should be addressed to our Com- <br />missioner rather than to the Commission as <br />a whole." <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />"I second .Mr. Peterson's motion." <br /> <br />"Might I inquire if the motion might <br />be made more effective if worded to oppose <br />the amendment to the By-Laws?" <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"I certainly think it appropriate, be- <br />fore such a move was mad~,that this Board <br />request some explanation from the Upper <br />Colorado River Commission as to why this <br />move is contemplated. I think they should <br />show us the courtesy of making an explana- <br />tion to this Board so that we can be fully <br />informed before they take any such action." <br /> <br />"I think my motion should coincide with <br />Mr. ~liller's ,suggestion that the objection <br />Colorado should raise should be against the <br />amendment rather than the moving of the <br />offices." <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. WHITTEN: <br /> <br />"I think Mr. Peterson's motion stated <br />the whole thing." <br /> <br />"Wouldn't it be appropriate to ask our <br />Commissioner to defer action until the mat- <br />ter is explained to this Board? I think we <br />have a definite responsibility to the State <br />of Colorado in 'connection with that amend- <br />ment and before we can make any intelligent <br />decision we ought to have the matter explained <br />to us." <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.