My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02516
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/12/1958
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />l~~l <br /> <br />"I think any motion to that effect <br />would tie in with the Natural Resources <br />Board." <br /> <br />~Mr. Chairman I believe this Board <br />should take action as a Board interested <br />in conservation, then it could be funneled <br />through proper channels to get an overall <br />commitment. I do not see any reason at all <br />why we do not have enough information now <br />so that this Board can take a stand on it. <br /> <br />I would like to move that we do strong- <br />ly oppose the establishment of the wilder- <br />ness areas that have been proposed." <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: "Is there a second to that?" <br /> <br />MR. BURR: "I second the motion." <br /> <br />MR. BARNARD,JR.: "Do you have reference to the specific <br />wilderness legislation?' <br /> <br />JUst as a suggestion, Pete in order <br />to leave some latitude for the Director to <br />coordinate with the other agences why not <br />make it that this Board very strongly express <br />its support of the multiple use theory of <br />natural resources as opposed to a limited <br />use of those resources and that every effort <br />be made to coordinate with other resource, <br />agencies to arrive at a specific proposal <br />or specific position in respect to any pro- <br />posed legislation effecting these multiple <br />uses." <br /> <br />GOV. McNICHOlS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Before you vote on this, let me point <br />out to you that sometime ago when the <br />Curecanti Project was being discussed, one <br />of our State agencies took a position against <br />it and it was an unfortunate thing and per- <br />haps not intended the way it worked out. <br />But when you get back into Congress and then <br />you find you are making fodder for your <br />opposition by having them reach back into <br />. the minutes of an independent agency <br />and say' .They don't know what they want, <br />one agency wants one thing and one agency <br />wants another', I think before this Board <br />takes any action on that we ought to get the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.